Organismal/Evolutionary Bio

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

docelh

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2010
Messages
933
Reaction score
10
So I'm taking this one in the fall, and from last year's syllabus, it's 19 chapters of tedium. From what I can tell, very little of this course will be useful on the MCAT (60% of the course devoted to plants, taxonomy, population ecology). And 19 chapters seem excessive for a one semester science course.

Conclusion: Will probably be the least enjoyable class in the entire sequence.

Reasons:

- More memorized reading than Bio II.
- Less conceptual than O-chem, physics, Gen Chem
- More chapters than Bio II or Gen Chem.

Members don't see this ad.
 
Keep an open mind and you will find applications and connections to medicine.
 
Your enjoyment of many college courses will probably rise if you don't view school as MCAT prep.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Man, it sucks that your college biology department insists on teaching you biology instead of acting as your MCAT prep course.
 
I've been a TA for this class at UCSD for the last 10 quarters now and I would say the memorizing isn't too bad because it isn't very hard stuff to memorize. I agree that most of it wouldn't be on the MCATs but it is still interesting stuff to learn.
 
19 chapters is nothing. I just completed a microbiology course that consisted of 28 chapters over six weeks. Now that is tedium.
 
SDN is filled with a bunch of whiners. I hear more than my share of them. I'm not surprised by the responses, as it's par for the course.

Few things:

- On MCAT. You forget 90% of the info you learn from college. That it is on the MCAT actually improves the odds I'll remember it, instead of going short-term rote for the semester mid-term/final.

- On 19 chapters is nothing. I hate bio textbooks. They're so unfocused, and have a higher tendency to go on tangential examples. Our textbook is terrible because it's written by so many co-writers, so it's really annoying to switch between various author's writing styles.

- On enjoyment. Clearly, I prefer the conceptual thinking in the other pre-med courses. Medicine will have a lot of details, but at least those guys don't have to deal with textbooks.

Go ahead, flame away.
 
You won't have to deal with textbooks in medicine?
 
I have no idea what you meant by that then.
 
You mean the syllabus. Yea I know. But I find it hilarious that you think it'll be conceptual rather than memorization after undergrad.
 
You mean the syllabus. Yea I know. But I find it hilarious that you think it'll be conceptual rather than memorization after undergrad.

I think you're hilarious for making stupid assertions to sound cool. Clearly, you didn't read what I wrote.

Medicine will have a lot of details, but at least those guys don't have to deal with textbooks.

Hope you pay better attention to your syllabus than SDN postings.
 
i had two evolutionary bio passages on my mcat
 
docel, did you seriously complain about people whining in this thread which was created to whine about your class
 
Hate to break it to you pal, but these are their own tracks at some schools.

At my school, they offer 5 or 6 tracks within the biology degree, including organismal AND evolutionary separately

I am taking the organismal track and the cellular/molecular track...there is nothing that bad in there if you have a true interest in the subject matter
 
Top