Overqualified?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MUSCDMD
  • Start date Start date
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
M

MUSCDMD

This is just out of curiosity, not concern. Basically, I applied to 5 schools: MUSC, Chapel Hill, Columbia, Harvard, and VCU. I'm from SC, so MUSC is my state school and VCU is my "safety" school. I received interviews at every school EXCEPT... VCU. Why not?

Basically, at this point I don't care if VCU offers me an interview or not. If they do, I'm not going to take it because I'm pretty set on my other options. My stats are admittedly very good, but not jaw-dropping: 4.0, 22/22/20. I'm also a White, middle-class male from a public university, if that's of interest.

So basically, I'm just curious if VCU hasn't offered me because I'm "overqualified" or maybe they just didn't see anything special about my app that the other schools did. But not only did I receive interviews at the other 4 schools, I received the first round of interviews at each of those schools leading me to think I'm a fairly strong applicant this cycle, especially for VCU which is not very selective OOS.

The only reason I ask this question is to see if there is such a thing as being overqualified. Because what if for some reason VCU was my #1? That would suck to get into Harvard and Columbia but not the school of my choice, right? I'm not bragging, whining, complaining, etc. I'm sincerely curious and would like to be informed so I can help others in the application process in the future. Because as of now, it looks like VCU took my money and ran with it. Thoughts?
 
This is just out of curiosity, not concern. Basically, I applied to 5 schools: MUSC, Chapel Hill, Columbia, Harvard, and VCU. I'm from SC, so MUSC is my state school and VCU is my "safety" school. I received interviews at every school EXCEPT... VCU. Why not?

Basically, at this point I don't care if VCU offers me an interview or not. If they do, I'm not going to take it because I'm pretty set on my other options. My stats are admittedly very good, but not jaw-dropping: 4.0, 22/22/20. I'm also a White, middle-class male from a public university, if that's of interest.

So basically, I'm just curious if VCU hasn't offered me because I'm "overqualified" or maybe they just didn't see anything special about my app that the other schools did. But not only did I receive interviews at the other 4 schools, I received the first round of interviews at each of those schools leading me to think I'm a fairly strong applicant this cycle, especially for VCU which is not very selective OOS.

The only reason I ask this question is to see if there is such a thing as being overqualified. Because what if for some reason VCU was my #1? That would suck to get into Harvard and Columbia but not the school of my choice, right? I'm not bragging, whining, complaining, etc. I'm sincerely curious and would like to be informed so I can help others in the application process in the future. Because as of now, it looks like VCU took my money and ran with it. Thoughts?

If you're really interested in attending VCU, then send a letter of intent or call them. I'm sure they would gladly take you.
 
Here's some additional not too wild possibilities:

Even though your app fee check was cashed, they didn't properly record it and thus they are still waiting for an app fee.

OR

There are a few applicants who share the same name as you. They mixed up the applications or confused them during the review process and thus another dude undeservingly got an interview that was suppose to go to you.
 
How are those examples anything other than wild? :laugh:



First of all... there is no such thing as an overqualified dental school applicant. Period. Fact. End of story.

Not everything is based upon on your DAT and/or GPA. It may get you in the running, but it does not guarantee anything. An understanding of this fact answers 90% of all SDN threads.

As others have suggested, there are certain schools who may not offer interviews based on perceived interest level, or lack thereof. You were required to fill out a section on your application listing the other programs you were applying to. Your level of honesty in this section may have sealed your fate. VCU knows that if you were offered acceptance everywhere, you are unlikely to select VCU without prior acknowledgment of interest.

There are many qualified candidates, few interview slots, and even fewer final positions. Schools want to maximize the use of those interview slots. It is no small task to fill a class and maintain student body profiles with reasonable consistency year to year. This is especially true of public state schools as these programs understand that the 'out of state' applicants are applying to many other schools and may not necessarily rank their program at the top. Private schools like Harvard and Columbia can operate somewhat differently.

State schools sometimes consider residential proximity in their interview selection process. Being from South Carolina can be a slight advantage for UNC as the state shares a border.

If you are or were serious about VCU you can always submit something noting your level of interest or intent. It would never hurt to keep your options open.
 
This is just out of curiosity, not concern. Basically, I applied to 5 schools: MUSC, Chapel Hill, Columbia, Harvard, and VCU. I'm from SC, so MUSC is my state school and VCU is my "safety" school. I received interviews at every school EXCEPT... VCU. Why not?

Basically, at this point I don't care if VCU offers me an interview or not. If they do, I'm not going to take it because I'm pretty set on my other options. My stats are admittedly very good, but not jaw-dropping: 4.0, 22/22/20. I'm also a White, middle-class male from a public university, if that's of interest.

So basically, I'm just curious if VCU hasn't offered me because I'm "overqualified" or maybe they just didn't see anything special about my app that the other schools did. But not only did I receive interviews at the other 4 schools, I received the first round of interviews at each of those schools leading me to think I'm a fairly strong applicant this cycle, especially for VCU which is not very selective OOS.

The only reason I ask this question is to see if there is such a thing as being overqualified. Because what if for some reason VCU was my #1? That would suck to get into Harvard and Columbia but not the school of my choice, right? I'm not bragging, whining, complaining, etc. I'm sincerely curious and would like to be informed so I can help others in the application process in the future. Because as of now, it looks like VCU took my money and ran with it. Thoughts?
Perhaps your arrogance shone through the application.
 
As Dr. Healy would tell you at VCU, they really select their interviews carefully. They don't want to interview too many or too few; they want people who would be a good fit for their program.

If they are your safety school than don't be upset.
 
As Dr. Healy would tell you at VCU, they really select their interviews carefully. They don't want to interview too many or too few; they want people who would be a good fit for their program.

If they are your safety school than don't be upset.
Where is amalgamgrillz?
 
This is just out of curiosity, not concern. Basically, I applied to 5 schools: MUSC, Chapel Hill, Columbia, Harvard, and VCU. I'm from SC, so MUSC is my state school and VCU is my "safety" school. I received interviews at every school EXCEPT... VCU. Why not?

Basically, at this point I don't care if VCU offers me an interview or not. If they do, I'm not going to take it because I'm pretty set on my other options. My stats are admittedly very good, but not jaw-dropping: 4.0, 22/22/20. I'm also a White, middle-class male from a public university, if that's of interest.

So basically, I'm just curious if VCU hasn't offered me because I'm "overqualified" or maybe they just didn't see anything special about my app that the other schools did. But not only did I receive interviews at the other 4 schools, I received the first round of interviews at each of those schools leading me to think I'm a fairly strong applicant this cycle, especially for VCU which is not very selective OOS.

The only reason I ask this question is to see if there is such a thing as being overqualified. Because what if for some reason VCU was my #1? That would suck to get into Harvard and Columbia but not the school of my choice, right? I'm not bragging, whining, complaining, etc. I'm sincerely curious and would like to be informed so I can help others in the application process in the future. Because as of now, it looks like VCU took my money and ran with it. Thoughts?

4.0 is about 99%tial
22 is about 98-99%tial...

May I ask what do you consider Jaw-Dropping?
 
Perhaps your arrogance shone through the application.

Because clearly my 30 cumulative posts on this anonymous website scream exhibitionism... It was a serious question to which others have kindly offered quality perspective.
 
4.0 is about 99%tial
22 is about 98-99%tial...

May I ask what do you consider Jaw-Dropping?

Haha. Yeah, you can't beat a 4.0 I guess. I was more referring to the freaks on SDN with 23+ AA and PAT. But collectively I realize I'm a strong applicant, hence my primary question in the thread. I think people have more or less answered the question. Thanks, guys. Just curious, that's all.
 
Because clearly my 30 cumulative posts on this anonymous website scream exhibitionism... It was a serious question to which others have kindly offered quality perspective.
Thank you for confirming my speculation.
 
Haha. Yeah, you can't beat a 4.0 I guess. I was more referring to the freaks on SDN with 23+ AA and PAT. But collectively I realize I'm a strong applicant, hence my primary question in the thread. I think people have more or less answered the question. Thanks, guys. Just curious, that's all.

You can beat 4.0 if your 4.0 was earned at a less than competitive institution.

Not trying to be a jerk and you certainly may have attended an out of state public university despite your residency, but South Carolina is not exactly known for having stellar, ultra-competitive undergraduate programs.


I'll re-emphasize... a GPA is meaningless without additional information. It would be an apples and oranges comparison unless everyone went to the same program of study.

The DAT is the ONLY standardized element of the application.
 
You can beat 4.0 if your 4.0 was earned at a less than competitive institution.

Not trying to be a jerk and you certainly may have attended an out of state public university despite your residency, but South Carolina is not exactly known for having stellar, ultra-competitive undergraduate programs.


I'll re-emphasize... a GPA is meaningless without additional information. It would be an apples and oranges comparison unless everyone went to the same program of study.

The DAT is the ONLY standardized element of the application.
Said the UVA grad.
 
You can beat 4.0 if your 4.0 was earned at a less than competitive institution.

Not trying to be a jerk and you certainly may have attended an out of state public university despite your residency, but South Carolina is not exactly known for having stellar, ultra-competitive undergraduate programs.


I'll re-emphasize... a GPA is meaningless without additional information. It would be an apples and oranges comparison unless everyone went to the same program of study.

The DAT is the ONLY standardized element of the application.

Fair enough. But the school I attend in SC is a top 23 national public university. It's SC primary and secondary education that is horrendous, not our universities.
 
Fair enough. But the school I attend in SC is a top 23 national public university. It's SC primary and secondary education that is horrendous, not our universities.
enough said.
 
enough said.


Well Harvard, Chapel Hill, and Columbia certainly didn't degrade my public education. GT, UVA, Chapel Hill, William and Mary, UC Berkeley, UCLA, Penn State, Michigan. All public universities. Do you have a point, or do you just prefer to be an ******* rather than to offer constructive, informed criticism?
 
Well Harvard, Chapel Hill, and Columbia certainly didn't degrade my public education. GT, UVA, Chapel Hill, William and Mary, UC Berkeley, UCLA, Penn State, Michigan. All public universities. Do you have a point, or do you just prefer to be an ******* rather than to offer constructive, informed criticism?
Are any of the schools you just mentioned of equal caliber to your university?
 
Check out "Yield Protection" or do a google search for "Tufts Syndrome."

I have read articles where college administrators admit that they do indeed do this for undergrad, where they have 7,000 seats to fill, but it's anyone's guess how it would relate to dental school admissions, if at all.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tufts_syndrome
 

Similar threads

Top