I'm not so sure that it will HAVE to be extracted,
According to "Contemporary Orthodontics" Third Edition:
(this can be verified on page 430 of the text book)
"Ankylosed primary teeth with permanent successors pose a potential alignment problem for the permanent teeth. Although they usually resorb in the normal manner without creating long term problems, occasionally they are retained by an attachment in the cervical region and are not exfoliated on schedule....Appropriate management of an ankylosed primary tooth consists of maintaining it until an interference with eruption or drift of other teeth begin to occur, then extracting it and placing a space maintainer..."
It also references a study done by Kurol and Thilander in the Journal of Orthodontics 6:277-293, 1984 to support this.
Of course I have NO empirical evidence of my own to support this, but I know that this is the philosophy we have at UNC. This way the tooth will serve as a space maintainer as long as possible, and LIKELY it will exfoliate without any real sequelae. Other schools may have other philosophies (nothing wrong with that), but I wanted to share my limited view. 🙂
Also, Good point DDSSlave about sounding the tooth. 👍
grtuck