Hello,
I have finished CDP, and today, I have tried PAT in Achiever.
From the beginning, I was very puzzled and annoyed.
As many other posts mention, it seems that achiever is "a lot" harder than (especially keyhole and top, side view sections). Well, I think rather than "harder," it was more "nasty." For example, in the keyhole questions, there are many questions in which we need to distinguish the slightly different.. relative positions or width to find right anwer. I know there are those kinds of problems in CDR too, but the ones in Achiever are much less clear. And also, the images they use are very very low quality compared to CDR (smaller with many many pixel cracks, especially in Angle ranking). So, in terms of the appearance, image size, quality, and types of problems, which one between CDP and Achiever does the real DAT PAT resemble more?
I have finished CDP, and today, I have tried PAT in Achiever.
From the beginning, I was very puzzled and annoyed.
As many other posts mention, it seems that achiever is "a lot" harder than (especially keyhole and top, side view sections). Well, I think rather than "harder," it was more "nasty." For example, in the keyhole questions, there are many questions in which we need to distinguish the slightly different.. relative positions or width to find right anwer. I know there are those kinds of problems in CDR too, but the ones in Achiever are much less clear. And also, the images they use are very very low quality compared to CDR (smaller with many many pixel cracks, especially in Angle ranking). So, in terms of the appearance, image size, quality, and types of problems, which one between CDP and Achiever does the real DAT PAT resemble more?
