- Joined
- Feb 13, 2001
- Messages
- 1,343
- Reaction score
- 9
OK - I know this has been discussed several times within the past month, but I have yet another angle on it that I need to ask about.
My school recently completely restructured our pathology course and from what I can tell, the main change is going from a format invented and refined by our old professor of 20 years or so to a new format that is 100% based on big Robbins. The old class relied solely on thick syllabi (which were effectively textbooks in their own right, written by the professor in full textbook style) and most people in the class did not read Robbins very extensively. The syllabi were complete and outside resources were not commonly used.
I got the new syllabus for the 1st quarter and it's about 100 pages long (vs. about 800 pages from last year's syllabi covering the same material). The syllabus is completely in outline format - no detail, just key words and phrases. The class seems to be structured such that each lecture covers a set number of pages out of big Robbins. So, lecture 1=pp 1-30, lecture 2=pp 31-60, lecture 3=pp 61-90, etc. The main ideas outlined in the syllabus are the same main ideas within each chapter in Robbins. Interestingly, they have gone to such pains to structure the class after big Robbins that each main idea is even presented in the exact same order that it is presented in Robbins.
So here is the question: If I'm essentially taking exams based on big Robbins, do I have to actually read big Robbins or will baby suffice? Is it really possible for the average student (who reads at an average speed and retains information at an average rate) to read big Robbins cover to cover multiple times? And be able to prepare for exams with it? I generally need to read something 3 or 4 times before it's committed to memory, and then review it 2-3 times right before the test. It seems like this would be a nightmare to do with big Robbins. The first 3 weeks of class covers general path, which is about 400 pages of text from big Robbins. That's a hell of a lot of info to read and memorize. Baby Robbins is about 200 pages - a lot more manageable.
Does baby Robbins cover the same topics in the same order? Is it just big Robbins without the fluff? The M2s at my school can't give much advice since their course was wildly different than this one is going to be (and they didn't have to read the text at all).
I've already bought big Robbins. The question now is whether baby Robbins would be appropriate to use in this situation (and keep big Robbins for reference).
My school recently completely restructured our pathology course and from what I can tell, the main change is going from a format invented and refined by our old professor of 20 years or so to a new format that is 100% based on big Robbins. The old class relied solely on thick syllabi (which were effectively textbooks in their own right, written by the professor in full textbook style) and most people in the class did not read Robbins very extensively. The syllabi were complete and outside resources were not commonly used.
I got the new syllabus for the 1st quarter and it's about 100 pages long (vs. about 800 pages from last year's syllabi covering the same material). The syllabus is completely in outline format - no detail, just key words and phrases. The class seems to be structured such that each lecture covers a set number of pages out of big Robbins. So, lecture 1=pp 1-30, lecture 2=pp 31-60, lecture 3=pp 61-90, etc. The main ideas outlined in the syllabus are the same main ideas within each chapter in Robbins. Interestingly, they have gone to such pains to structure the class after big Robbins that each main idea is even presented in the exact same order that it is presented in Robbins.
So here is the question: If I'm essentially taking exams based on big Robbins, do I have to actually read big Robbins or will baby suffice? Is it really possible for the average student (who reads at an average speed and retains information at an average rate) to read big Robbins cover to cover multiple times? And be able to prepare for exams with it? I generally need to read something 3 or 4 times before it's committed to memory, and then review it 2-3 times right before the test. It seems like this would be a nightmare to do with big Robbins. The first 3 weeks of class covers general path, which is about 400 pages of text from big Robbins. That's a hell of a lot of info to read and memorize. Baby Robbins is about 200 pages - a lot more manageable.
Does baby Robbins cover the same topics in the same order? Is it just big Robbins without the fluff? The M2s at my school can't give much advice since their course was wildly different than this one is going to be (and they didn't have to read the text at all).
I've already bought big Robbins. The question now is whether baby Robbins would be appropriate to use in this situation (and keep big Robbins for reference).