path source

[medicinehopeful]

---

Members don't see this ad.

hey all,
so far this year, i've been using brs path and rapid review path. i use the rapid review path with the goljan lectures to follow with. with the new rapid review path out, is it worth to buy the new edition? if i do, would it be a safe decision to replace the brs path with the new RR path? i like BRS, but the writing is just too small. and i've already got some notes into brs for cardio, renal, and resp. so thats another reason why i'm contemplating switching to the RR path. do most people that use RR path for step 1 use just that? or do you all add extra notes into it from robbins?

 

[Taus]

I have notes in BRS for about 7-8 chapters. I've been using solely RR w/ class and Goljans audio since the book came out and will be transferring my notes from BRS-->RR during board study time. I just like the format and layout of RR that much better and would rather have it in the same order/etc as the audio itself. I also figure that the process of transferring notes from one book to the other will be active learning and well worth it.