I am surprised SDN hasn't realized the potential in mapping how much the different aspects of your application matter, in order to secure a resident spot. We are all humans, and humans are very manipulable, even program doctors. For instance, I know that if I litter a paper with profanities, it won't get published, even if it could cure cancer. Because ppl have their hang-ups. If I have 5k posts on SDN, and I start an argument with a moderator, I am gonna get my behind hauled off this webpage faster than [insert random profanity here]. It doesn't matter whether all my points are valid, or whether I am right. What matters is the psychological thing. Hey, that hardly comes as a surprise to doctors whose IQ averages in the 120 interval, right? (Barring the most obsessive-compulsive personalities, who don't want to see behaviour psych facts in the eye, due to how they wish to see humans. Wishes always triumphs over fact, we are self-deceptive animals.)
The Hare Krishna dudes realized how ppl are manipulated when you play the reciprocity game, handing out flowers, and then asking for a donation. Cunning. SDN should have provided a platform telling us what kind of flowers to hand out.
There should be statistics covering how you are most likely to score an interview, based on what kind of questions you are asked before on an interview, just like chessgames.com has a database on which moves are most statistically likely to secure a win, providing the correct opener. It is not about authenticity, or being right. If a douche program director starts the regular "would you tell if you caught your friend cheating" dilemma, you will not get a spot if you go on a rant based on modern philosophy and psychological knowledge, quoting how ethics is all BS, and just a rationalization of more basic instincts and herd behaviour. Forgetaboutit. What you need to do, is to cough up the right answer to get a spot, whether it is in med school, a residency spot, a job, whatever.
It is not unethical, as they literally beg you to be deceptive, given how arguments aren't likely to have an impact anyway. It is all about calculating what robots you are up against. Manipulate. Fake it to make it.