Yes, yes, pharmacy is bad, job market no good, I get it.
Anyway, a lot of schools have these "minimum" requirements, but then you look at their stats on accepted students and theres always students that break the rules. Even UCSF which is one of the top schools, it has a minimum gpa of 2.8, but according to their stats students with 2.2's have been accepted, which is just insane, but maybe they were special cases.
So I'm applying right now, and I'm trying to decide what school to do early decision on, I want to apply to USC. I didn't do great academically, 3.1 overall, 2.9 science, 2.7 pre-pharmacy (for USC specifically). So they say they have a 3.0 pre-pharmacy minimum GPA, in addition to the 3.0 overall minimum. I sen't them an email asking how serious this is and if I should even bother using them as my early decision school. I feel like they're going to say "yes it is mandatory" to make themselves look good or something and just not give me a straight answer, but I emailed them anyway and I'm waiting on a response.
Idk, what do you guys think about these minimum requirements? Should I focus on another school for early decision or do you think my 2.7 pre-pharmacy might be overlooked? I could do early decision to WesternU, and I'll probably get it, but then I can't even attempt to apply to USC since I'll have to commit to WesternU. If I got into USC I could live at home and save a ton of money as well. Either I apply to WesternU with early decision and basically get in forsure and commit to that, or I apply to USC early decision, probably get rejected, and apply to USC again during the regular application. But a part of me is also worried and thinks "what if I can only get into WesternU with early deacon, and I dont get in during regular" (from what I've heard early decision MIGHT raise your chances of getting in)
And yes I know, pharmacy bad, job market no good, gonna be homeless.