- Joined
- Apr 9, 2017
- Messages
- 56
- Reaction score
- 47
University of Arizona just accepted someone with a 26 ON THEIR PCAT! (see pre-pharm forum)
dude not even 26, he came back and clarified that it was a 23..........................................
Except this year the dean dropped a few requirements (such as you must have at least a B in ochem and anatomy) and class of 2021 now has 140 students.It's actually an improvement, I'm serious. Prior years had a low of 12% and 16%.
Now here is the most important point not to be overlooked. For this incoming class at U of Arizona, they actually DID NOT FILL THE ENTIRE CLASS! Only 111 entered out of 120. BRAVO to U of Arizona for not accepting anyone with a pulse and leaving 9 slots open. This actually improved all their class profile stats, avg PCAT is finally above 70% again!
If only more schools like U of Arizona start doing this the pharmacist oversupply can be alleviated.
P.S. I'm sure other schools are accepting students as bad as this. U of Arizona is actually just very honest in revealing detailed class profile stats (just Google em).
It's actually an improvement, I'm serious. Prior years had a low of 12% and 16%.
Now here is the most important point not to be overlooked. For this incoming class at U of Arizona, they actually DID NOT FILL THE ENTIRE CLASS! Only 111 entered out of 120. BRAVO to U of Arizona for not accepting anyone with a pulse and leaving 9 slots open. This actually improved all their class profile stats, avg PCAT is finally above 70% again!
If only more schools like U of Arizona start doing this the pharmacist oversupply can be alleviated.
P.S. I'm sure other schools are accepting students as bad as this. U of Arizona is actually just very honest in revealing detailed class profile stats (just Google em).
Also false. At least 10 students in my class are out of state and probably about 15 are international. None fall under the WICHE. Go to the school's website and you'll see they are trying to cater to international students now. Dean Schnellman is running this place like a business, our future's be damned.There's also the issue that U of A does not admit out of state except for WICHE unless under exceptional circumstances.
My alma mater published an 86% graduation rate. From the interns I have talked to I expect that number to get worse each year.Last year one of my interns told me 20% of his class was held back over the course of pharmacy school...
It's actually an improvement, I'm serious. Prior years had a low of 12% and 16%.
Now here is the most important point not to be overlooked. For this incoming class at U of Arizona, they actually DID NOT FILL THE ENTIRE CLASS! Only 111 entered out of 120. BRAVO to U of Arizona for not accepting anyone with a pulse and leaving 9 slots open. This actually improved all their class profile stats, avg PCAT is finally above 70% again!
If only more schools like U of Arizona start doing this the pharmacist oversupply can be alleviated.
They filled the class with 140 the next year by dropping standards, look at their class thread.9 less students is good, but it's still nothing. Every pharmacy school in the world could close and accept zero students, and there would still be an oversupply of pharmacists.
If they can make it out, let them in.
If they can't, let them pay for their stupidity.
So, in other words, they are just passing and graduating people just so their program won't be under scrutiny, not because the students actually should have passed or graduated. I already knew this just from looking at the Naplex pass rates, but I didn't know 6% was the cut off. How stupid. So it's more important to graduate people on time than to prepare competent pharmacists apparently.ACPE won't allow it...if the failure rate reaches 6% in any given graduating class, it's a problem. If the delayed a year (or two) rate reaches 6% in any given graduating class, it's a problem.
Do either of these things three times in a five year period, and it's a big problem for the program.
On time graduation rate and total graduation rate are getting far more attention than NAPLEX pass rates. For now.
Last year one of my interns told me 20% of his class was held back over the course of pharmacy school...
So, in other words, they are just passing and graduating people just so their program won't be under scrutiny, not because the students actually should have passed or graduated. I already knew this just from looking at the Naplex pass rates, but I didn't know 6% was the cut off. How stupid. So it's more important to graduate people on time than to prepare competent pharmacists apparently.
So you said if a program admits 100 students, it needs to have 94 students graduating on time. If it can't do this 3 years in a 5-year period, ACPE won't allow and will do something about it, correct?ACPE won't allow it...if the failure rate reaches 6% in any given graduating class, it's a problem. If the delayed a year (or two) rate reaches 6% in any given graduating class, it's a problem.
Do either of these things three times in a five year period, and it's a big problem for the program.
On time graduation rate and total graduation rate are getting far more attention than NAPLEX pass rates. For now.
But where do I find that 6% standard? I looked at the ACPE standards document and searched for "6%" and "graduation" and it didn't come up.
Go here: PharmD Program Accreditation
Click on the Tools and Resources tab
Under the FAQ, click the question titled "When will a program be asked to identify the cause of any negative changes or trends in on-time graduation rates?"
Voila.