Howdy, y'all.
So let's get right down to rusty tacks. I just finished an MFA program in poetry, which is an even less tenable career move than joining the circus. Regardless, I did very well, managed to score a few publications and laurels, learned the intricacies of the trapeze and how to tame a lion, and I escaped with a GPA just shy of 4.0.
During my program, though, I started to work in public health (as an HIV/STD counselor, and now as a public health researcher). Alas and alack, it restimulated my long-repressed fascination with and love of medicine, which I had discarded when I was scared off by calculus in high school.
So I've decided to take the plunge: Whomever willing, I'm starting a post-bacc program at Northwestern in the fall. Moreover, I've got a decent (3.7) undergrad GPA from a pretty elite school, an almost-4.0 in my masters' program, several years working experience in social service and public health -- and, when I finally finish all those science course, a liberal education to be reckoned with.
However, I'm scared that I'm going to have to "explain away" my MFA, like it's an ear rivet, or a drug conviction. I'm glad I did it (so there!): it's "one of those things I'd always wonder about" -- a very expensive thing to wonder about, but a puzzler just the same. And I've become a much stronger reader, and -- aw, hell, who'm I kidding? -- I love poetry and it gave me three years to play artist.
So (finally), my question: does anybody else have those attic-children that they feel they have to explain, minimize, or mitigate? Or am I being goofy in thinking that a master's degree in zee arts is going to make me seem a little...fluffy?
grazie,
john
So let's get right down to rusty tacks. I just finished an MFA program in poetry, which is an even less tenable career move than joining the circus. Regardless, I did very well, managed to score a few publications and laurels, learned the intricacies of the trapeze and how to tame a lion, and I escaped with a GPA just shy of 4.0.
During my program, though, I started to work in public health (as an HIV/STD counselor, and now as a public health researcher). Alas and alack, it restimulated my long-repressed fascination with and love of medicine, which I had discarded when I was scared off by calculus in high school.
So I've decided to take the plunge: Whomever willing, I'm starting a post-bacc program at Northwestern in the fall. Moreover, I've got a decent (3.7) undergrad GPA from a pretty elite school, an almost-4.0 in my masters' program, several years working experience in social service and public health -- and, when I finally finish all those science course, a liberal education to be reckoned with.
However, I'm scared that I'm going to have to "explain away" my MFA, like it's an ear rivet, or a drug conviction. I'm glad I did it (so there!): it's "one of those things I'd always wonder about" -- a very expensive thing to wonder about, but a puzzler just the same. And I've become a much stronger reader, and -- aw, hell, who'm I kidding? -- I love poetry and it gave me three years to play artist.
So (finally), my question: does anybody else have those attic-children that they feel they have to explain, minimize, or mitigate? Or am I being goofy in thinking that a master's degree in zee arts is going to make me seem a little...fluffy?
grazie,
john
!