🙂 Yeah, this is one of my bigger peeves as well. I do think it differs depending on VA. I, personally have not had pressure from management to diagnose these things. I've done several TBI C&P's, in addition to countless mTBI evaluations over the past several years. As can be expected, most are concluded to be mild with no expected residuals, and I've openly opined about secondary gain issues in some where the evidence warranted it. So far, I've gotten no pushback. If I ever did, I would honestly tell supervisors that I would either not accept mTBI referrals if I couldn't do my job the right way, or simply leave the job.
I think it's a fascinating phenomenon--in it's own right and (if there was ever a way to 'get away with it,' studying the subtle and insidious pressures within a system to give or not give certain diagnoses would be fascinating at the VA. I think ya'll have hit the nail on the head in that it's not so much explicit or 'hit you over the head with punishment or negative consequences' contingencies at work (in influencing some biased diagnostic practices) but far more subtle factors including:
a) the 'it just ain't worth it' factor - I have had a lot of people hint (mostly indirectly) at this one. For example, why would I (as a mental health C&P examiner) not just give every applicant for PTSD who can fill out a PTSD Checklist (PTSD self-report) and say that they have nightmares, irritability, sit with their back's to the wall, etc. a presumptive PTSD diagnosis? It's quick, easy, and, hey, if they have 5 or 6 other 'diagnoses' on record in the chart already, your 'No Diagnosis' or 'Adjustment Disorder' diagnosis ain't gonna change their service-connection. Besides, you're potentially (in the long run) facing hassles (from them complaining to the administration, etc.) and/or verbal/physical assault (because you are potentially threatening the income stream of a personality-disordered, undercontrolled, homeless, desperate person with likely real mental health issues (if not PTSD) and they could hurt or kill you. Why in the world would you want to risk all of that? I mean, by just giving the diagnosis, you are really making your job much more difficult/complicated, which gets me to my second factor...
b) the 'you're shooting yourself in the foot' factor - especially with respect to 'productivity,' wRVU's, and performance reviews. I frequently 'get behind' and have a backlog of reports because I'm actually taking the time to do decent differential diagnosis / case formulation to try to figure out what's really going on with each case I see. This makes me look like a 'problem employee' relatively speaking when compared to others who just do a likety-split interview, cursory chart review, and efficiently just build a case for the diagnosis being claimed and are done with plenty of time to spare.
c) the 'conformity factor' - nobody else is engaging in active hypothesis-testing regarding response bias or over-reporting of psychopathology (and giving, at least, an MMPI or other measure that might provide pertinent data), so it must not be a good/advisable thing to do
d) the 'what good will it do...if they come up as exaggerating, what then? (a.k.a., 'Nothing good (and everything bad) can come of testing them.) - I have actually had a colleague state this explicitly.
Problem is, no one is looking at it from a 'systems' perspective (especially over time). Common sense tells ya that the more malingerer's 'push the boundaries,' the more those boundaries will be pushed in the long term (cases in point are situations with folks claiming PTSD who were stationed in Alaska during the Vietnam War and are claiming the criterion A stressor was being told by a drill sargeant that they were gonna get sent to Vietnam (never were sent, actually) and get into combat and be killed. Forty years ago. Ruined the man's life (caused him to become an alcoholic, lose jobs, etc.). If there is no 'pushback' against this kind of thing, it will only continue to get more absurd (maybe, I was thinking the other day how awful it would have been if I were born earlier and were drafted to go to Vietnam and become a prisoner of war...now I have PTSD). Don't laugh--it's coming to a VA near you.
And, most importantly, this is how systems rot and collapse from the inside-out. Each individual just 'looks the other way' (diffusion of responsibility) and the terms/diagnoses drift into less and less meaningfulness or construct-validity. People who are okay with the 'double-think' are rewarded and promoted. People principled enough to be troubled by the system and who stick their heads up to do the right thing are outliers and get attacked (verbally, politically, and perhaps even physically). If, collectively, all of us meerkats would stand on our hind legs and just state/address the obvious, things would be okay and no individual meerkat would be at risk. But that's also a societal problem and I am way off point
🙂