- Joined
- Aug 3, 2017
- Messages
- 1,902
- Reaction score
- 4,104
What is your opinion on the movement to discontinue public water flouridation. Please. No politics.
Bad for dental public health. Good for business.What is your opinion on the movement to discontinue public water flouridation. Please. No politics.
What is your opinion on the movement to discontinue public water flouridation. Please. No politics.
What proven systemic health effects is ~.7 mg/L causing in the population?Systemic health effects v. effects on caries. I don't support fluoride unless for topical purposes only. I don't think it will increase the rate of caries significantly. Patient's oral hygiene and dietary habits still play a bigger role.
Who knows what the effects are over a long period of time, but if it's something that I wouldn't want forced onto me, I wouldn't want it forced onto others. It's pretty electronegative and partially cumulative over time.What proven systemic health effects is ~.7 mg/L causing in the population?
There have been some studies linking Fluoride with lower IQ in developing children. Again. I don't have enough information to make a case, but there has been interest in whether or not the public should be forced to have Fl in their drinking water.What proven systemic health effects is ~.7 mg/L causing in the population?
I thought those studies showed that this was the case for higher concentrations and not at 0.7 ppm. Anything can be harmful at a high enough concentration.There have been some studies linking Fluoride with lower IQ in developing children. Again. I don't have enough information to make a case, but there has been interest in whether or not the public should be forced to have Fl in their drinking water.
Finally I have an excuse as to why I am dumb: I drank fluoridated water growing up!There have been some studies linking Fluoride with lower IQ in developing children. Again. I don't have enough information to make a case, but there has been interest in whether or not the public should be forced to have Fl in their drinking water.
About 65% of Americans grow up on and drink fluoridated water. And about 75% of communities have fluoridated water. It is NOT effecting the IQ at the .7 mg/ L. If it was, we would know. That’s ~ 200 million people drinking it and growing up on it.There have been some studies linking Fluoride with lower IQ in developing children. Again. I don't have enough information to make a case, but there has been interest in whether or not the public should be forced to have Fl in their drinking water.
This is my understanding as well.I thought those studies showed that this was the case for higher concentrations and not at 0.7 ppm. Anything can be harmful at a high enough concentration.
I feel the same way lol.Finally I have an excuse as to why I am dumb: I drank fluoridated water growing up!
Iodine in salt too.Should they force folic acid on the general public too? I’m all for people having a choice but when it doesn’t do any harm and has at least a few benefits then I don’t think there should be a debate about it. If people are that worked up about fluoride in the water then they should go buy a filter.
Against the movement. Simply put, the benefits outweigh the risks on a community level.
The U.S. Surgeon General has stated that water fluoridation "is the single most effective public health measure to prevent tooth decay and improve oral health over a lifetime, for both children and adults."
The CDC named fluoridation of drinking water one of 10 great public health interventions of the 20th century because of the dramatic decline in cavities since community water fluoridation started in 1945.
Not taking a side here but just adding to the conversation.What proven systemic health effects is ~.7 mg/L causing in the population?
Read the study. Very very poorly conducted. So many assumptions made with so many potentially confounding variables. You have to look past the headlines.Not taking a side here but just adding to the conversation.
A new study, led by researchers at the Keck School of Medicine of USC and funded in part by the National Institutes of Health, analyzed more than 220 mother-child pairs, collecting data on fluoride levels during pregnancy and child behavior at age three. The researchers found that a 0.68 milligram per liter increase in fluoride exposure was associated with nearly double the chance of a child showing neurobehavioral problems in a range considered close to or at a level to meet the criteria for clinical diagnosis.
![]()
Fluoride exposure during pregnancy linked to increased risk of childhood neurobehavioral problems, study finds
Related News Sweeping review reveals latest evidence on the diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of ADHD March 25, 2024 Air pollution exposure during childhood linked directly to adult bronchitis symptoms in […]keck.usc.edu