First of all, I'd like to say hi to y'all. I've been reading for awhile and the forum is a wonderful bastion of civility for the most part, and has been a critical factor in my decision to go the MSTP route. So thanks.
In a post the other day, it was mentioned that getting an R01 during the PhD phase would enable the grantee to get pretty much any faculty post he/she wanted, as top universities don't really provide funding for anything any more. But my understanding of the R01 application was that a huge chunk of the form is dedicated to proving you have enough institutional support to make it worth their while--how many square feet of lab space, what equipment you already have, etc. Do they make special considerations for PhDs, or does your app just have to be so good that they overlook the fact that you're still just a student? If the latter is true, that would mean getting an R01 as a PhD candidate is even harder than getting one as a faculty member 🙁 .
Any answers would be great....
Ciao,
Ari
In a post the other day, it was mentioned that getting an R01 during the PhD phase would enable the grantee to get pretty much any faculty post he/she wanted, as top universities don't really provide funding for anything any more. But my understanding of the R01 application was that a huge chunk of the form is dedicated to proving you have enough institutional support to make it worth their while--how many square feet of lab space, what equipment you already have, etc. Do they make special considerations for PhDs, or does your app just have to be so good that they overlook the fact that you're still just a student? If the latter is true, that would mean getting an R01 as a PhD candidate is even harder than getting one as a faculty member 🙁 .
Any answers would be great....
Ciao,
Ari