RACZ catheter

Started by theD.O.C.
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

theD.O.C.

Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
20+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I was wondering if anyone had any experience using the RACZ catheter in floro procedures. If so what kinds of procedures and what kind of problems have occured. I have seen it used in selective nerve root blocks and in lysis of adhesions. I especially liked the selective nerve root blocks for cervical levels since you insert in the t2-3 interspace thus decreasing the chance of tweaking a nerve root or running into an artery in the neck. All I can see are positives compared with the traditional method of nerve root blocks, I am sure I am missing something (or else no one would be directly accessing the nerve roots under floro) so any experience is appreciated.
 
I can't say that I'm really an expert and you'd probably get a better response from an attending or fellow. My impression thus far is that the main drawbacks with the Racz catheter is the cost (over $100) and the extra time involved. We mainly use it for epidurolysis and to reach the upper cervical roots (C3, C4, C5).
 

Similar threads