• AMA with Certified Student Loan Professional

    Join SDN on December 7th at 6:00 PM Eastern as we host Andrew Paulson of StudentLoanAdvice.com for an AMA webinar. He'll be answering your questions about how to best manage your student loans. Register now!

Rad Onc

bcc5592

Junior Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Oct 23, 2001
17
0
Augusta, GA
NA
    I'm applying to RadOnc. From what I can tell, it
    is probably more competitive this year than last.
    I started off pretty confident, but am now
    starting to question the wisdom of not applying
    to more programs and possibly even a backup
    specialty. If you have any other questions, feel
    free to ask.
     

    Academic Radiation Oncologist

    Junior Member
    7+ Year Member
    15+ Year Member
    Dec 2, 2001
    14
    3
    Illinois
      I am an attending radiation oncologist in a major academic institution. When I was still in residency, I served as the chief resident for 3 years. So I was involved in the resident selection process for 3 years. Research projects really count. If you can get your paper accepted for presentation in a national meeting (ASTRO is the most prestiguous meeting), you have an edge over other applicants. Better still, you have a publication or 2 in a field of radiation oncology. It's crucial to do a rotation in a reputable rad onc program, so you can get letters from the people there. In the recent two years, the quality of the applicants are just phenomemal. Many of them are in the top quartile of their classes. Everybody has rotated in a radiation oncology department. The residents in my program (my residency) are very well qualified. Two of them are board certified internists (one from Mayo Clinic). The other two are in the top 25% in their medical schools. In summary, to improve your chance of getting matched to a rad onc residency, buff up your CV with rad onc research projects. Try and arrange for rad onc rotations in top-notched places like MDACC, UCSF, MSKCC, FCCC, UF, U of M, U of Chicago, Mayo, MIR, MGH, JCRT, Stanford and U of Wisconsin. For rad onc projects, try to pick a project with less than 100 patients. If there is good support, 4 weeks is adequate to write up a paper.

      Good luck.

      Academic Radiation Oncologist
       
      About the Ads

      Academic Radiation Oncologist

      Junior Member
      7+ Year Member
      15+ Year Member
      Dec 2, 2001
      14
      3
      Illinois
        I nearly forget. Board scores always count a lot. If you are interested in a particular program, try to arrange for a rotation there. If they like you, you would have a higher chance getting matched there. People are usually more comfortable with the medical students they know. But I don't know how much time MS have for outside rotations. I know a radiation oncologist who took one year off when he was a MS 4 to rotate through several top-notched departments. He matched to a top-notched program. :)
         

        AnnK

        Junior Member
        7+ Year Member
        15+ Year Member
        Dec 2, 2001
        24
        0
        Milwaukee
          Thanks for the interesting info on this subject. Im an M3 interested in RadOnc. I was reading all this old info about how it was pretty moderatly difficult to get into and now Im finding out that there is nothing easy about getting a residency spot in rad onc.
          The thing I have going for me is a Phd. My research was involved cyclins so its vaguely cancer related. Ive done fine in med school but not stellar - top half but im not sure about top quarter. Board scores in the low 230s. And I go to MCW which is pretty average as a med school, i think. So, for those of you getting a feel for this area I would be really interested to know what you think of my chances - should I be thinking about a back up or do you think I should be okay? Id be really interested in anyones thoughts!
           

          Academic Radiation Oncologist

          Junior Member
          7+ Year Member
          15+ Year Member
          Dec 2, 2001
          14
          3
          Illinois
            MCW has an excellent radiation oncology program. They are very active in national protocols. They have excellent faculty. Try to arrange for a rotation there and secure a research project. You're MS 3 and still have time to finish your research project before you apply for residencies. I think if you can secure a position in MCW, you'll get excellent training. The other program in WI is U of W at Madison. It's also an elite program. They also have excellent faculty. You can also arrange for a rotation there. It's just a couple of hours from Milwaukee. :)
             

            AnnK

            Junior Member
            7+ Year Member
            15+ Year Member
            Dec 2, 2001
            24
            0
            Milwaukee
              Thanks for the great info. I hadn't thought about doing a research project in rad onc before I graduate. I wouldn't have thought that there would be time for that. I suppose if data could be accumulated in spare time that a paper could be written in a month. I'll have to think about that.
              Im glad to hear that MCW is well respected in this field. And Madison seems like a reasonable possibility for an away rotation.
              Thanks again!!
              Ann
               

              Mandelin Rain

              Full Member
              10+ Year Member
            • Apr 21, 2011
              2,383
              5,368
                Wow, this thread from 2001. Seems unreal. The fall from grace 20 years ago is amazing. It truly is sad. Very sad.
                This was just the start of competitive rad onc. 10 years later it was like, "I have PhD, a 270 step 1, honors on all clinicals, 4 Nature pubs, and letter from 4 nationally known rad oncs signed in blood....WILL I MATCH??????"
                 
                • Like
                Reactions: 5 users

                TheWallnerus

                e^(iπ) + 1 = 0
                Lifetime Donor
                2+ Year Member
                Apr 3, 2019
                1,410
                3,414
                1. Attending Physician
                  Wow, this thread from 2001. Seems unreal. The fall from grace 20 years ago is amazing. It truly is sad. Very sad.
                  If we're bringing up old threads from the past, can we bring up a few where people lost their minds about people taking a vaccine during radiation treatments?
                   

                  Lawpy

                  31% Full Member
                  7+ Year Member
                  SDN Ambassador
                • Jun 17, 2014
                  57,562
                  148,715
                  Replacement Chat
                  forums.studentdoctor.net
                    This was just the start of competitive rad onc. 10 years later it was like, "I have PhD, a 270 step 1, honors on all clinicals, 4 Nature pubs, and letter from 4 nationally known rad oncs signed in blood....WILL I MATCH??????"

                    How do those guys react to the complete disastrous crash of rad onc?
                     
                    • Like
                    Reactions: 1 users

                    Gfunk6

                    And to think . . . I hesitated
                    Moderator Emeritus
                    Lifetime Donor
                    Verified Expert
                    15+ Year Member
                    Apr 16, 2004
                    4,175
                    2,970
                    SF Bay Area
                    1. Attending Physician
                      1617731158536.png
                       
                      • Like
                      • Love
                      • Haha
                      Reactions: 4 users
                      About the Ads

                      Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

                      1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
                      2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
                      3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
                      4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
                      5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
                      6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
                      7. This thread is locked.