I'm not defensive, nor a M1. I've been pretty open about data sources and facts. And how do you know I'm not able to interpret match lists? What is your opinion based on? Pure speculation?
I don't mind a poll at all, but I doubt you'll get enough participants to make it meaningful. I've been in Galveston for a while doing vacation rentals and I know the city well enough. I only wish others to have an accurate, objective view of UTMB. It pains me when people say it's a dump, when it clearly is not and that's plain badmouthing. Would tourists keep coming and would I be in business if it's a dump?
As far as US News, you can check on their website that mentions it's ranking for UTMB is
outdated: "
[1] School refused to fill out U.S. News statistical survey. Data that appear are from school in previous years or from another source such as the National Center for Education Statistics."
Unranked doesn't mean anything.
Also, what's your point? Are you saying that San Francisco is a dump? My point was you can't buy a toolshed as a RE property "for sale", so it's not a comparison. I never mentioned any illegal rentals that violate building codes. Median property values are definitely strongly inversely related to being a dump, look at Cleveland. Very low property value, and I doubt anyone would not call it a "dump". Tanglewood - one of the highest property values in Houston and voted best neighborhood. Would sane human beings pay almost half a million USD in median home prices to live in a dump?
What likely happened is you went to the cheapest place you could afford to go in Galveston (perhaps even rented a toolshed) and found the bad part of town. Hardly an unbiased view of the city as a whole.