Hello wise SDN members, I am taking the actual DAT in 2 weeks.
It seems like many of the SDN users are using S&D to tackle the RC section.
I've been using some what modified (?) S&D technique.
I first read the whole passage in 6-9 minutes, writing down key words
for each paragraph. Then I answer the question based on what I've read,
and answer the detailed questions by going back to the passage.
However, when I see the break downs for the actual DAT,
high RC scorers are using S&D and they recommend it. Due to my
suckiness in English, I can't really do S&D efficiently.
I've been getting 19-20 on RC in Kaplan and Achiever tests using my technique, which is fine.
But it seems like there's more detail questions than tone/inference questions on
the actual DAT. So I'm wondering which technique would be the best for me.
Thank you in advance!
It seems like many of the SDN users are using S&D to tackle the RC section.
I've been using some what modified (?) S&D technique.
I first read the whole passage in 6-9 minutes, writing down key words
for each paragraph. Then I answer the question based on what I've read,
and answer the detailed questions by going back to the passage.
However, when I see the break downs for the actual DAT,
high RC scorers are using S&D and they recommend it. Due to my
suckiness in English, I can't really do S&D efficiently.
I've been getting 19-20 on RC in Kaplan and Achiever tests using my technique, which is fine.
But it seems like there's more detail questions than tone/inference questions on
the actual DAT. So I'm wondering which technique would be the best for me.
Thank you in advance!
