- Joined
- Dec 18, 2008
- Messages
- 212
- Reaction score
- 10
Hello,
I've been hearing that the recent RC has "changed" in a way that S&D doesn't work well.
Did it resemble Crack Dat Reading?
People have said that CDR contains more tone/inference questions, and it's hard to do well on it by solely utilizing S&D (correct me if I'm wrong).
However, while doing CDR, I skip the tone/inference questions and use S&D on the detail questions. Then, when I go back to the tone/inference questions, I know exactly what the answer is because I've read the passage while doing S&D for the detail questions.
The thing is that I get all the tone/inference questions correct, but do terrible on the detail questions. This is somewhat weird considering that I'm doing S&D.
My question is: If I'm getting these tone/inference questions right on CDR, would it work for me when I go in for the actual DAT RC?
I would appreciate your replies, because I don't know if I should change my RC method or not.
Thank you! 🙂
I've been hearing that the recent RC has "changed" in a way that S&D doesn't work well.
Did it resemble Crack Dat Reading?
People have said that CDR contains more tone/inference questions, and it's hard to do well on it by solely utilizing S&D (correct me if I'm wrong).
However, while doing CDR, I skip the tone/inference questions and use S&D on the detail questions. Then, when I go back to the tone/inference questions, I know exactly what the answer is because I've read the passage while doing S&D for the detail questions.
The thing is that I get all the tone/inference questions correct, but do terrible on the detail questions. This is somewhat weird considering that I'm doing S&D.
My question is: If I'm getting these tone/inference questions right on CDR, would it work for me when I go in for the actual DAT RC?
I would appreciate your replies, because I don't know if I should change my RC method or not.
Thank you! 🙂