I applied to MD schools this cycle and have been fortunate to receive several acceptances I am currently considering.
One is a top 30 med school I liked at lot at the interview and in a vacuum could see myself happily attending, but it is a high-cost private school and I'll have to take out loans to pay for most of school (which I appreciate is the norm for med students and I would be okay doing, but it is a huge amount of debt to be in and that is not ideal).
The other school I'm considering is a regional campus of a state school, where I would receive a degree from the state school proper but I would spend the entirety of my four years with the very small regional campus class (about 20 people/year) in a program that recently opened. The people seem nice and serious at the regional campus and they claim that the intimacy of the program will pay dividends with small-group clinical rotations, but the program seems more risky since it is not a main campus and it is new and so untested (though I have been told that since the MD degree they confer is identical to their main campus program this might be less of an issue?). The huge upside to the regional campus program is that I would receive a half tuition scholarship for all four years which, when loan interest and taxes are considered, can be worth in excess of $340,000.
Long story short, do I take the fine MD program at the regional campus and leave med school with shockingly less debt, or do I forgo the scholarship to go the more traditional route? Does anyone with experience in the field know if there is a stigma or anything against people that graduated from regional campuses? I hear all the time that med school is all about working hard as an individual to get high step 1 scores, and that aside from that the differences between schools aren't massive (which means maybe I should take the scholarship). I'm very on the fence and would love any insight.
One is a top 30 med school I liked at lot at the interview and in a vacuum could see myself happily attending, but it is a high-cost private school and I'll have to take out loans to pay for most of school (which I appreciate is the norm for med students and I would be okay doing, but it is a huge amount of debt to be in and that is not ideal).
The other school I'm considering is a regional campus of a state school, where I would receive a degree from the state school proper but I would spend the entirety of my four years with the very small regional campus class (about 20 people/year) in a program that recently opened. The people seem nice and serious at the regional campus and they claim that the intimacy of the program will pay dividends with small-group clinical rotations, but the program seems more risky since it is not a main campus and it is new and so untested (though I have been told that since the MD degree they confer is identical to their main campus program this might be less of an issue?). The huge upside to the regional campus program is that I would receive a half tuition scholarship for all four years which, when loan interest and taxes are considered, can be worth in excess of $340,000.
Long story short, do I take the fine MD program at the regional campus and leave med school with shockingly less debt, or do I forgo the scholarship to go the more traditional route? Does anyone with experience in the field know if there is a stigma or anything against people that graduated from regional campuses? I hear all the time that med school is all about working hard as an individual to get high step 1 scores, and that aside from that the differences between schools aren't massive (which means maybe I should take the scholarship). I'm very on the fence and would love any insight.