- Joined
- Apr 16, 2000
- Messages
- 996
- Reaction score
- 6
This isn't a big deal since I'm not even applying until next year, but I was thinking about my (very limited) research experience and what I need to know about it for interviews. I spent a summer at the NIH in 2000 (so the experience will have been 4 years old by the time I would be interviewing), I was a sophomore at the time with a limited science background and basically just did lab gopher work for a few months. It was a fun experience and I met some interesting people, but I wasn't heavily involved in the research--I just did things like preparing buffer solutions. I only remember the basic outlines of the research the doctor I was working with was performing. What level of knowledge will I be expected to have about this? I have heard that people are often grilled about research they were involved in, is this always the case or only if you emphasize your research experience on your app? I did get an LOR from the doctor I worked with. Obviously I will review the info I have about the research before I go on interviews, but I am a little worried that I'll sound like an idiot if they start asking me detailed questions about the experiements or my participation in them, since I didn't really do all that much of interest there.
BTW, I am a non-science major with no interest in doing research as a doctor; actually, my experience at the NIH, while positive overall, nonetheless solidified my intuition that research would not be the best fit for my personality. I know I will want to have enough knowledge about the work to give a general explanation of it and that I'll want to emphasize what I learned there despite my limited role, I just hope I'm not expected to come off like a whiz about research that I was involved with for 3 months several years ago. If that is the case, though, then I figure I best start boning up on it sooner rather than later so I don't get caught with my proverbial pants down when some PhD starts quizzing me about it at an interview.
BTW, I am a non-science major with no interest in doing research as a doctor; actually, my experience at the NIH, while positive overall, nonetheless solidified my intuition that research would not be the best fit for my personality. I know I will want to have enough knowledge about the work to give a general explanation of it and that I'll want to emphasize what I learned there despite my limited role, I just hope I'm not expected to come off like a whiz about research that I was involved with for 3 months several years ago. If that is the case, though, then I figure I best start boning up on it sooner rather than later so I don't get caught with my proverbial pants down when some PhD starts quizzing me about it at an interview.