how the program is structured matters a lot less than the diversity/acuity of the patient population you're working with and the quality of the supervision.
Boy, id agree with this. I love early exposure to psychotherapy. I think the sweet spot is some exposure in PGY-2 followed by a sizable panel in PGY-3 and at least some carryover to PGY-4.
But diversity is the unsung quality to look for. You want diversity of patients and pathology.
Will you get uninsured or underinsured patients? Patients naive to psychotherapy? LGBTQ? An array of race and ethnicity? Patients of immigrant culture?
Will you be largely limited to mood/anxiety cases? How about trauma work (and training/supervision in CPT, PE, etc)? What about psychosis-focused (CBT, ACT, etc)? What about group, family, and couples?
What is the supervision like and by who? Are these experts in their fields or a hodgepodge of folks from the private practice community with questionable credentials who want to have" Acme University faculty" on their website? How many hours of supervision per week and is it individual, pairs, or small group?
I think WingedOx hit the nail on the head. Applicants tend to focus on when psychotherapy starts rather than if it's any good at a potential program. In the long run, you'll be much better off with great training at a program that had you starting psychotherapy as a PGY-3 than a place that has you picking up psychotherapy cases as a PGY-2 with ho-hum training.