Residency programs favoring MD/PhD applicants

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

keforce

New Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2006
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Which residency programs/specialties look favorably upon applicants graduated from a MD/PhD program? I am currently a 6th year MD/PhD student on my M3 rotations...still haven't decided on a specialty yet. I understand that most MD/PhD graduates go into internal medicine and its sub-specialties, and surgery has little preference whether the applicant has a PhD background. Can anyone tell what kind of advantage and how much of an advantage does MD/PhD have over MD applicants. And, perhaps list the specialities that most prefer MD/PhD. Thanks.
 

I think that certainly Medicine and peds will likely have preference for MD/PhDs since they will only make up a small minority of total numbers respectively. I think Path also has a definite preference for PhDs, and they probably make up a much larger percentage of total applicants... probably the same in Rad Onc and derm. However, I think that surgical specialties in general don't care too much and would rather have AOA applicants... Rads seems to be in this boat as well.
 
However, I think that surgical specialties in general don't care too much and would rather have AOA applicants... Rads seems to be in this boat as well.

Neurosurgery is an exception to this from what I've heard. In fact, I'm pretty sure that a PhD (or more importantly, the research required to earn one) is a significant enough factor in the Nsurg match that it can even offset a lackluster Step I score. Of course 15-16 years of training after undergrad is quite a stretch of preparation for one's career.
 
Harvard's dominance in the numbers is just sick(ening)...
 
In fact, I'm pretty sure that a PhD (or more importantly, the research required to earn one) is a significant enough factor in the Nsurg match that it can even offset a lackluster Step I score.

According to who? The PhD is the icing on the cake. You need the cake first. Everyone I know who has matched into neurosurg from here has been AOA. Then again, maybe the types that are gung-ho enough to do neurosurg are the types who are gung ho enough to be AOA.
 
According to who? The PhD is the icing on the cake. You need the cake first. Everyone I know who has matched into neurosurg from here has been AOA. Then again, maybe the types that are gung-ho enough to do neurosurg are the types who are gung ho enough to be AOA.

According to the Neurosurgery internet forums at UncleHarvey.com:

"MD/PhD's in the match" Thread.

"OK then Why is a PhD a benefit?" Thread.

I never made any statement regarding AOA status... all I meant to suggest is that, at least according to some of these guys, the PhD seems like more than just icing.
 
all I meant to suggest is that, at least according to some of these guys, the PhD seems like more than just icing.

Thanks for the links, you could be right 🙂 The data as to how much the PhD helps one come match time is conflicting and difficult to interperet, which leads to our confusion.
 
Sick in a good way or bad? If bad, why do you say that?

Sick as in amazing...but then also kinda freaky that one school likes mudphuds sooooo much, and/or that mudphuds like this one school soooooo much.
 
Sick as in amazing...but then also kinda freaky that one school likes mudphuds sooooo much, and/or that mudphuds like this one school soooooo much.

In part it's because they have the best overall reputation, and if you do an MD/PhD and want an academic career that is very important.

Let's not forget that it's also an excellent place to train, and Boston is a great city (although a bit cold).
 
Look to the far right of the first page for programs that I capture - I include some non-MSTPs (all that I can find).
Stupid question--I just noticed the tabs on the bottom. I'm looking at the 2007 match by specialty, but the numbers in the first column don't line up with the numbers in the second column. For example, there are 15 anesthesiology residencies listed, but you've written 4 for anesthesiology in the second column. Where did the 4 in the second column come from? It looks like the other residencies match up (ex. child psych, child neuro, EM). Maybe it's a typo?
 
Look to the far right of the first page for programs that I capture - I include some non-MSTPs (all that I can find).

Sorry...I meant Physician Scientist Training Pathways (or Programs)...the programs that combine residency and research fellowship training. Not that I'm concerned about this right now, but does anyone know how admission to PSTPs differs from the traditional residency match?
 
It's funny to see how the numbers drop to pretty low once you get into the surgery specialties. Do you think 6/7 year MdPhDs look @ 5+ more years and say, "**** that"?
 
It's funny to see how the numbers drop to pretty low once you get into the surgery specialties. Do you think 6/7 year MdPhDs look @ 5+ more years and say, "**** that"?

I'm sure that's part of it... but in general it's also the fact that surgery is a bad field to go into for research purposes (IMHO), and the lifestyle is horrendous.
 
For Gfunk:

Animatedsparta.gif
 
Top