1)It was recently approved for agitation associated with Alzheimer disease dementia, although it came out in 2015.
2)Its the first drug approved for this.
3)*It was surprisingly fast tracked
4)It has the FDA highest box warning.
5)Mortality in the elderly is at least 3 time as high compared to placebo
6)I will not mention side effects!
The age old question:
1) Does the advantage of taking Rexulti out weigh the disadvantages??
2)Any other prudent options for treating agitation related to Alzheimer disease dementia?
3)Would or should this be given to a VIP or anyone??
4))Any thoughts on this?
1. The company sponsored three clinical trials in AD agitation since it came out,
summary is here. These take a lot of time to enroll.
2. Yes! It was actually the first
new drug approval in AD since Belsomra for related sleep problems, which resulted in yawns.
3. Agitation is a terrible condition. It results in horrific burden for caregivers. As a result of unmet need, they applied for fast track.
Ad Com voted 9-1 for approval. The one vote against was from a "drug safety" advocate.
4. Yes, class effect. Patients and families should be aware that although the drug is generally well tolerated, there is an imbalance in death rates for this class vs. placebo. The mechanism and etiology of these deaths is not clear, and thankfully they are rare, so it is hard to study. No individual deaths in the trials were thought related to the drug.
5. Absolute risk is very low, and benefits are clear.
6. Mention the side effects, same with any drug. This is actually the benefit to the drug. At 2 mg, it is well tolerated. It is also vastly better than alternatives.
Age old answers:
1. Yes. Disadvantages aside from black box are not clear, as the med does not sedate or result in PDism.
2. None are approved! People try anything and everything, even medications that firmly DO NOT WORK like valproic acid, trazodone, AChEis, and ultimately settle on benzos and neuroleptics like seroquel. I should mention that Europe approved risperidol.
3. The notion that one would alter care for a VIP is abhorrent. Never do this. If you cannot, then you MUST refer them elsewhere for their sake and yours. The entire thought process, that some patients are more important than others is highly toxic. It will corrode you from the inside. There are excellent methods to deal with people with connections, money, and fame; really like any other socioeconomic group from homeless to aerospace engineer to never-worked housewife. Probably the first rule is to address the elephant: "you're a prince/doctor/Noble winner/CEO, but here you are my patient and I am your doctor. I will take care of you like anyone else." This also sets good boundaries.
4. Other thoughts: movement disorder docs use anything under the sun to give their patients more on time and treat their non-motor symptoms. ALS docs will infuse a drug for 10 days on and 10 off to gain a month more of function. Stroke docs will move mountains to get a wake up stroke with favorable imaging to the cath lab. You can see the stigma of the disease - and the neglect and dismissal of caregiver burden - by cognitive neurologists and PCPs failing to see the advance as a great win. For the first time we can control a truly horrific neuropsych problem, which I have seen result in many ER visits and admits, and really terrible stuff.