Ribavirin for RSV?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

unsung

Full Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2007
Messages
1,356
Reaction score
16
I'm confused by this. UWorld has this as an answer to a Q about treating bronchiolitis.

I picked Oseltamivir, mostly 'cuz I thought Ribavirin was a trick answer (since I thought it was no longer recommended for RSV infection)... hence I thought it couldn't be RSV, even tho' it's more common.

But the answer turned out to be Ribavirin.

Soo... is this just a UWorld thing, or are we supposed to accept Ribavirin as a treatment on the actual Step?
 
I'm confused by this. UWorld has this as an answer to a Q about treating bronchiolitis.

I picked Oseltamivir, mostly 'cuz I thought Ribavirin was a trick answer (since I thought it was no longer recommended for RSV infection)... hence I thought it couldn't be RSV, even tho' it's more common.

But the answer turned out to be Ribavirin.

Soo... is this just a UWorld thing, or are we supposed to accept Ribavirin as a treatment on the actual Step?


i don't know if anybody knows the answer for sure, but...

If you see it on the real thing and another answer isn't pavlizumab or no treatment then I would guess it is the 'right' answer
 
Ribavirin — Ribavirin is a nucleoside analog with good in vitro activity against RSV. Ribavirin is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of RSV infection.

In children — The routine use of nebulized ribavirin in infants and children with RSV LRTI is not recommended. The efficacy of ribavirin in this population has not been clearly proven [16,17]. In addition, ribavirin is expensive and must be given early in the course to be effective, and there are concerns regarding occupational exposure [16]. (See 'Adverse effects' below.)

Randomized controlled trials comparing ribavirin with placebo in children with RSV LRTI have yielded mixed results. Some studies have demonstrated decreased severity of illness, decreased duration of mechanical ventilation, oxygen therapy and hospital stay, and decreased viral shedding [18-21], whereas other studies have not demonstrated these benefits [22-24]. A systematic review of randomized trials comparing ribavirin with placebo in infants and children with RSV infection and LRTI found that trials of ribavirin lack sufficient power to provide reliable estimates of the effects [16].

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends against the routine use of ribavirin [25]. Ribavirin should be reserved for immunosuppressed patients with severe RSV infection. Consultation with an expert in infectious diseases is recommended before its use.

In adults — Although the routine use of ribavirin is not recommended for infants and children with RSV LRTI, ribavirin may be beneficial for certain adults. Early use of inhaled ribavirin has been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality in adult bone marrow transplant recipients who develop RSV infections [26]. The efficacy of ribavirin for patients with solid-organ transplants is unknown [27,28].

Contraindications — Ribavirin is considered to be contraindicated in pregnant women, and a negative pregnancy test should precede its use in women of child-bearing age. Ribavirin is a known teratogen in rodent species. However, it has not been shown to be teratogenic in primates, and no adverse effects have been found in the human fetus.

Adverse effects — Adverse effects related to occupational exposure to ribavirin have not been reported. However, the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health has published recommendations to reduce the ambient air concentrations of ribavirin and limit occupational exposure to hospital personnel [29].
 
I would think it would depend on the wording of the question and the foils available - the right answer could just as easily be "supportive therapy". If the choice is between a bunch of antivirals, surely ribavirin would be the best choice, even though the indications for its use are narrow.
 
If you're given a bunch of choices that are antiviral drugs on the real exam, pick Ribavirin. If you are given the option of "supportive care" then pick that, because quite honestly I dunno how considering it's recent news they expect people to have a single story straight.
 
I just got this question and I'm quite upset about it. Everything I've read recommends against the use in RSV patients, and it doesn't sound like any study has shown effectiveness of this treatment.

Ribavirin is not recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics for use in RSV. This question should be deleted, and I would hope like hell this information would not end up on actual Step 1 exams now...
 
I'm confused by this. UWorld has this as an answer to a Q about treating bronchiolitis.

I picked Oseltamivir, mostly 'cuz I thought Ribavirin was a trick answer (since I thought it was no longer recommended for RSV infection)... hence I thought it couldn't be RSV, even tho' it's more common.

But the answer turned out to be Ribavirin.

Soo... is this just a UWorld thing, or are we supposed to accept Ribavirin as a treatment on the actual Step?

Last I checked RSV doesn't have neuraminidase, so I don't know why you would expect a neuraminidase inhibitor to work on it.

I just got this question and I'm quite upset about it. Everything I've read recommends against the use in RSV patients, and it doesn't sound like any study has shown effectiveness of this treatment.

Ribavirin is not recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics for use in RSV. This question should be deleted, and I would hope like hell this information would not end up on actual Step 1 exams now...

Nobody uses india ink anymore either. It's still tested.
 
Nobody uses india ink anymore either. It's still tested.

Not even close to the same thing. India Ink is still a legitimate way to stain for fungi (cryptococcus), whether it's used or not, it's not incorrect.

This is going directly against current recommended THERAPY for an infection. It is incorrect information.
 
Not even close to the same thing. India Ink is still a legitimate way to stain for fungi (cryptococcus), whether it's used or not, it's not incorrect.

This is going directly against current recommended THERAPY for an infection. It is incorrect information.

well, there's real life and there's the boards. For the boards -> RSV is treated with ribavarin. Just like on the boards, neurminadase inhibitors are for influenza, even though it came out that such treatments are no better than placebo. I'm still picking tamiflu if I see a question about drug therapy for influenza.
 
Not even close to the same thing. India Ink is still a legitimate way to stain for fungi (cryptococcus), whether it's used or not, it's not incorrect.

This is going directly against current recommended THERAPY for an infection. It is incorrect information.

It's a "pick the best answer" test. If your choice is between ribavirin and a list of other drugs, then you pick ribavirin. If it's between ribavirin and supportive treatment, then you pick supportive treatment.
 
Top