Robbins 7 versus Robbins 6

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Heellloooooo?

No one has an opinion on this book? Geez, if you can't get an answer about a pathology book from pathology residents, i dunno.....Maybe I should post this question in the FP forum instead! :laugh:
 
I've only seen it briefly. The changes I note are that the pictures are nicer and the authors have somewhat changed. None of the main authors are affiliated with Brigham anymore.

From what I have seen, it is, aesthetically, an improvement on the previous edition. In terms of the text, however, I can't claim any expertise. If I do get a good look at it I will let you know.
 
yaah said:
From what I have seen, it is, aesthetically, an improvement on the previous edition. In terms of the text, however, I can't claim any expertise. If I do get a good look at it I will let you know.

Thanks, I'll look forward to your reply!
 
I just picked it up yesterday.

It is very similar except this one seems to focus more closely on the immunology and genetics of disease. I don't care for the "color coding" or paper texture compared to the other one, but whatever....

Of course, this is the book to use as it is 4-5 years less outdated than the 6th edition.
 
I picked up the new Robbins recently but haven't had a chance to read much of it. It is definately larger than the 6th edition! Some of the chapters have new authors which may be good or bad; won't know until I read it. Overall, it looks like a worthy investment. With the increased information on molecular and genetic mechanisms, it will definately be something I use for path boards, particularly for non-neoplastic pathology. In fact, one of my attendings, a renal pathologist, said the chapter in the 6th edition on kidney was the best chapter for non-neoplastic kidney disease that he's come across in a general path textbook. I think the 7th ed may have a new author for this chapter, though.
 
Top