Scopolamine for depression

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Anasazi23

Your Digital Ruler
Moderator Emeritus
20+ Year Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2003
Messages
3,505
Reaction score
37
New article in the Archives.
"Antidepressant Efficacy of the Antimuscarinic Drug Scopolamine
A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

Maura L. Furey, PhD; Wayne C. Drevets, MD


Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63:1121-1129.

Context The need for improved therapeutic agents that more quickly and effectively treat depression is critical. In a pilot study we evaluated the role of the cholinergic system in cognitive symptoms of depression and unexpectedly observed rapid reductions in depression severity following the administration of the antimuscarinic drug scopolamine hydrobromide (4 µg/kg intravenously) compared with placebo (P = .002). Subsequently a clinical trial was designed to assess more specifically the antidepressant efficacy of scopolamine.

Objective To evaluate scopolamine as a potential antidepressant agent.

Design Two studies were conducted: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding study followed by a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover clinical trial.

Setting The National Institute of Mental Health.

Patients Currently depressed outpatients aged 18 to 50 years meeting DSM-IV criteria for recurrent major depressive disorder or bipolar disorder. Of 39 eligible patients, 19 were randomized and 18 completed the trial.

Interventions Multiple sessions including intravenous infusions of placebo or scopolamine hydrobromide (4 µg/kg). Individuals were randomized to a placebo/scopolamine or scopolamine/placebo sequence (series of 3 placebo sessions and series of 3 scopolamine sessions). Sessions occurred 3 to 5 days apart.

Main Outcome Measures Psychiatric evaluations using the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale and the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale were performed to assess antidepressant and antianxiety responses to scopolamine.

Results The placebo/scopolamine group showed no significant change during placebo infusion vs baseline; reductions in depression and anxiety rating scale scores (P<.001 for both) were observed after the administration of scopolamine compared with placebo. The scopolamine/placebo group also showed reductions in depression and anxiety rating scale scores (P<.001 for both) after the administration of scopolamine, relative to baseline, and these effects persisted as they received placebo. In both groups, improvement was significant at the first evaluation after scopolamine administration (P.002).

Conclusion Rapid, robust antidepressant responses to the antimuscarinic scopolamine occurred in currently depressed patients who predominantly had poor prognoses.


Author Affiliations: Mood and Anxiety Disorders Program, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md."
They're now testing the antidepressant effect in both transdermal and PO form.

Members don't see this ad.
 
My only reservation is having seen 3 patients and 1 family member become completely delirious on scopolamine. Of course, I haven't yet started using ketamine either, although it appears to have rapid onset antidepressant effects too.😉

MBK2003
 
Really fascinating stuff. I think this is a really interesting time in history, where so-called "psychadelic" drugs are being seriously reconsidered in research, after a long hiatus thanks to the 60s events inspired by Timothy Leary et al.

In the past few months, I've seen MDMA research at UCLA, Psilocybin research at Hopkins, Ketamine research at the NIMH, and now this research on scopolamine. Though still far from being mainstream, I think this research is ultimately leading to new frontiers in psychiatry.

However, my main concern is how these substances can be used in a safe and controlled manner...

Anthropologically, scopoloamine has been used in Columbia for hundreds of years in shamanistic practice in a preparation knows as Burundanga. Unfortunately, it has recently found popularity in organized crime in South America. Criminal elements often combine it with morphine in order to induce "twighlight sleep" (i.e. retrograde amnesia) for purposes of date-rape, robbery, and kidnapping. Similarly, Ketamine is commonly used a club-drug and is extremely addictive and has lead to overdoses of some famous researchers in this area.

Hopefully these drugs can be used in safe and effective formulations for the benefit of psychiatry without its abuse potential leading to a stop on further research.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Interesting...though at least scopolamine is not an illegal substance per se, as is ketamine.

I also have seen delirium secondary to its use, which isn't surprising given is pharmacology. However, it is widely prescribed every day (motion sickness etc.) without too much mainstream adverse effect - at least I think.

Seems that scopolamine has lots of cool off-label uses.

Elimination of death rattle
Treatment of ptyalism
Post anesthetic retrograde amnesia
Induction of mydriasis for Renaissance women
Narcoanalysis adjunct

Fun stuff.
 
Speaking of Narcoanalysis, whatever happened to this practice? I tried to do a lit search and resarch on it seemed to fall of the face of the earth after WWII....

I remember watching an old army movie in my history of psychiatry class where the psychiatrist administered sodium thiopental and hypnotized a war veteran, and immediately cured him of his psychosomatic disorder that was caused by exposure to war atrocities.

Is narcoanalysis/narcohypnosis still being done? Anybody have any experience/stories of this? What are the pros/cons? I have some experience with clinical hypnosis and it seems to me that this would potentially help with subjects that are not too hypnotizable by verbal induction.
 
Is narcoanalysis/narcohypnosis still being done? Anybody have any experience/stories of this? What are the pros/cons? I have some experience with clinical hypnosis and it seems to me that this would potentially help with subjects that are not too hypnotizable by verbal induction.

Because of endless and increasing hospital regulation, the use of these drugs often require anesthesia presence with full crash cart, intubation readiness, etc.

Many psychiatrists now see the process as too cumbursome. Though, it is still performed by some. The process is anecdotally useful in the psychosomatizer, difficult malingering cases, analysis, and other venues.
 
Interesting...though at least scopolamine is not an illegal substance per se, as is ketamine.

I also have seen delirium secondary to its use, which isn't surprising given is pharmacology. However, it is widely prescribed every day (motion sickness etc.) without too much mainstream adverse effect - at least I think.

Seems that scopolamine has lots of cool off-label uses.

Elimination of death rattle
Treatment of ptyalism
Post anesthetic retrograde amnesia
Induction of mydriasis for Renaissance women
Narcoanalysis adjunct

Fun stuff.

Ketamine - illegal???? I stock it in the hospital where I work & dispense it regularly to anesthesia.

I've also sent it to the mental health unit for an MD to use, I think as an adjunct during anesthesia during ect. That was a few years ago & I think an anesthesiologist was there as well....but I can't remember the details.

Its legal....just highly divertable so we keep an eye on how much we have & who gets it.

As for scopolamine...its great for its amnestic effect, but that's its negative, along with the dry mouth, for its use as an antiemetic patch. But for those who really don't get relief from other antiemetics - its worth it.

For end of life secretions (is that what you mean by the death rattle?)...a better drug is atropine ophalamic drops. Its cheap & easy to use. Scopolamine is hard to swallow by that stage & the patch takes too long to work.

Its used daily in veterinary offices & that is actually where most of the diversion originates. That is where it got its bad name, but it is a good adjunct for many situations. Most recently, some have combined it occassionally with a narcotic for post op pain, especially in opiod tolerant individuals.

You're right - its an old drug with people taking a new look at it.
 
Ketamine - illegal???? I stock it in the hospital where I work & dispense it regularly to anesthesia.
Yes, I should have been more specific...I should have said that it's rarely seen (at least by me) outside the OR, as opposed to scopolamine - much more controlled.

For end of life secretions (is that what you mean by the death rattle?)...a better drug is atropine ophalamic drops. Its cheap & easy to use. Scopolamine is hard to swallow by that stage & the patch takes too long to work.

Cool. I hadn't heard this, though it makes physiologic sense. I would be somewhat concerned that I'd accelerate the dying process with the risk of hypotension and tachy, however. Not sure if this would be worse than the use of transderm scop. My internal medicine days are over i.e. hopefully I won't get to try this out. If I do, I'm doing something wrong. Though it's a good thought for consults to help "treat the family." Anecdotally, I've seen the scop patch work quite well for the rattle. Can't quite recall how long it took to kick in though.
 
Since we're having a bit of discussion on ketamine and depression on the anesthesia forums, thought I might post a link to our discussion and get your feedback.

Have any of you seen it used on your wards and what effect have you noticed? As a private practitioner, I use ketamine on long OR cases especially on patients with high narcotic tolerances and on first day postops, the ones who are extubated do seem to be somewhat more cheerful given their circumstances. Entirely subjective, however.

I would think that a collaborative study between anesthesiology and psychiatry would be both fruitful and easy, given our ability to provide a large sample population in a very short period of time (in one month, I could provide a sample group of probably 50-100 by myself).

Food for thought.

http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showthread.php?p=4485049&posted=1#post4485049
 
I'm just astonished that a friggin' psychologist was first author on this paper in the #1 journal in psychiatry! What the hell do psychologists know about psychopharmacology!? :laugh:
 
I'm just astonished that a friggin' psychologist was first author on this paper in the #1 journal in psychiatry! What the hell do psychologists know about psychopharmacology!? :laugh:
I'm not sure if your post is meant as sarcasm, but it's inappropriate in this thread.

The psychologist v. psychiatrist battle that some members wish to perpetuate harms open discussion and collegiality within the psych community.

As with MD vs DO trolling or CRNA vs MD trolling, etc., your post is considered trolling and is a TOS violation.

If you feel that psychologists are not qualified to discuss psychopharmacology, then have this debate in a professional manner in a different thread dedicated to that subject -- not as a snipe in this thread.
 
Top