Scopus vs Medline

Started by qwopty99
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

qwopty99

Optometrist
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
hi folks,

for those who get published into peer-reviewed papers, u'll know that scopus indexes a greater number of journals than does medline. historically, and due to selectivity, publishing onto medline is a bigger accomplishment than "just" publishing to scopus.

that said, there are certain functions that scopus has that definitely sets it apart from medline. u can trace an author's work (and citations) using scopus by the click of a button - u can't accurately find the same info that easily with medline - it doesn't really function to do that.

my question is thus - because of scopus' broader reach/functions, will it ever "replace" medline? will someone view one's scopus publications as being the number one assessment of an author's works - or will it remain medline (or even further, Thompson's SCI) only?

i'm just asking cause i know of a very easy journal to publish into (its on scopus, but not on medline), and i'm wondering if i should bother making an effort to write additional papers into that journal, or just put ALL my effort into medline-indexed journals?

thanks.