- Joined
- May 16, 2005
- Messages
- 401
- Reaction score
- 190
The AAFP vs. the NBME on equating DNPs with Primary Care physicians. This article is being discussed in the FP forum.
I thought I'd bring up the fact that the AAFP is actually making a strong statement on the scope of practice for DNP/APNs with regard to that of FPs. This is what the ASA needs to do, too. Be the one to make the initial statement, not just respond to something the AANA states, regardless of how ludicrous the AANAs statements/studies are. The article deals more with licensure, hence the NBME, but isn't this what is already happening in the case of solo CRNAs? They get to play the role of the Anesthesiologist, and the public is none the wiser?
I thought I'd bring up the fact that the AAFP is actually making a strong statement on the scope of practice for DNP/APNs with regard to that of FPs. This is what the ASA needs to do, too. Be the one to make the initial statement, not just respond to something the AANA states, regardless of how ludicrous the AANAs statements/studies are. The article deals more with licensure, hence the NBME, but isn't this what is already happening in the case of solo CRNAs? They get to play the role of the Anesthesiologist, and the public is none the wiser?