A 3 year residency for podiatry is what blows my mind.
All this incentivizes is that Attendings use residents for scut work as much as possible.
2 years should be the max, and doing surgeries should be 80% of the focus.
I couldn't imagine how much scut work a resident would be forced to do if residency was 4+ years (which I know a couple pod residencies are 4 years already).
Yes and no.
For general podiatry (RFC, insoles, injects, derm stuff, wound care, etc), 3 years is too long. For sure.
However, for surgical podiatry (ORIFs, recons, etc), 3 years is a minimum for any MD that does proc/surgery... so even with pod school focused, podiatry should probably be 4yr for surgery.
But we missed our chance to do that dent model, and we have what we have: everyone's a 3yr residency "foot and ankle surgeon" (except some have a joke VA or baby hospital RFC residency, and others have pretty solid volume and skills in a legit teaching program with good DPM attendings).
...Either way, it's a moot point. That study in OP is obviously biased (study by the school doing 3yr), and it can't be seen as any help for real insight.
And at the end of the day, follow the money. If podiatry school was 3yr and not 4yr, that means the schools then need 25% more students/matriculants to have the same tuition profits. That won't happen. It'll stay 4 years (or 5yr, 6yr, 7yr, etc if they can string some students who should've flunked along for remediation cla$$es).
🙂