- Joined
- Mar 3, 2009
- Messages
- 31
- Reaction score
- 0
Besides Wash U, are there any other schools that put a heavy emphasis on GPA and MCAT and less on ec's, etc?
I know Tufts has minimum GPA and MCAT standards that if you meet them you're automatically accepted if you interview.
I know Tufts has minimum GPA and MCAT standards that if you meet them you're automatically accepted if you interview.
Yeah, I've never heard this.
Honestly, I don't really know of any such places. All of the places with really high stats get applications from ALL of the high stats people, so you need something more to make yourself stand out; at the places with lower average stats, they really may be more geared towards ECs and stuff. So I don't know that there are any top schools (other than maybe WashU) that really over-emphasize stats.
It must be 36 and 3.9 then...considering I got rejected post secondary...
there's a guy with 3.92 GPA and 39 MCAT that is waitlisted at WashU, so no, there aren't stats schools.
he did get an interview though...that's exactly what i was saying...you'll always get an interview if you have a good MCAT and a decent GPA...and we all know you're talking about ONOY
WashU interviews 5 days a week. Each day has 10 or more people. There are bound to be high mcat scores, and also lower mcat scores. They interview people with 3.5 GPA's or 33 MCAT's also.
wonder why u chose those numbers 🙄
but you missed the point...it seems that all high MCAT scores that come by their desks get an automatic interview.....i never said that all of their interviewees were high MCAT scorers....stop reading things that aren't there
Not automatic.
http://www.mdapplicants.com/viewprofile.php?id=10419
4th profile I clicked on. There might be many on the list.
3.58 overall gpa is low and azuza pacific university is not going to get her any points with WashU.
Not automatic.
http://www.mdapplicants.com/viewprofile.php?id=10419
4th profile I clicked on. There might be many on the list.
also it seems like all prereqs were taken at a CC
....why are you so adamant about arguing this?
No he's not. While I'm sure there are (very) occasional exceptions for people with truly amazing ECs and life stories, Washington seems very numbers-driven to me. As evidenced by the applicant that you selected -- low cGPA (for that particular school) --> no interview.
No he's not. While I'm sure there are (very) occasional exceptions for people with truly amazing ECs and life stories, Washington seems very numbers-driven to me. As evidenced by the applicant that you selected -- low cGPA (for that particular school) --> no interview.
In my experience (and in my own humble opinion, fwiw):
Wash U: the ultimate numbers ***** (I'm sorry, say what you will about them "caring about the whole applicant" but there's no earthly reason why their average MATRICULANT numbers should be the highest in the country, not when applicants with perfect numbers AND perfect EC's would probably also get into Harvard and Hopkins and all of those)
NYU seems to be taking a similar tack to Wash U and trying to climb the ranks by maintaining a very strict number cutoff. They're especially big on high gpa's and less impressed by high MCATs.
Sinai, on the other hand, seems to be less picky about GPAs and more into high MCAT scores, especially verbal scores.
I've also heard Tufts is trying to keep its numbers high. This makes sense, since they have a lot of linkage programs with Boston schools, in which GPA just has to be a 3.5 and MCAT doesn't matter. They'd probably have to have the rest of the applicants have high numbers to counteract that.
auto invites: UM/Pitt/Vandy/UTSW/some state schools for IS apps (you should be applying to those anyway)
I believe there are multiple factors in autoinvitations, but you have to apply early
I agree about the NYU/MSSM comment
Not sure Vandy auto-invites. Vandy is unique because only people who get interviews have to fill out secondaries, but I'd never heard before now that they have auto-invites.auto invites: UM/Pitt/Vandy/UTSW/some state schools for IS apps (you should be applying to those anyway)
I believe there are multiple factors in autoinvitations, but you have to apply early
I agree about the NYU/MSSM comment
you are right, my fault!Not sure Vandy auto-invites. Vandy is unique because only people who get interviews have to fill out secondaries, but I'd never heard before now that they have auto-invites.
Wash U: the ultimate numbers ***** (I'm sorry, say what you will about them "caring about the whole applicant" but there's no earthly reason why their average MATRICULANT numbers should be the highest in the country, not when applicants with perfect numbers AND perfect EC's would probably also get into Harvard and Hopkins and all of those)
i find it ironic that people on here say that wash u is all about numbers and in the MSAR, Wash U says that they also value commitment to medicine besides exceptional academic record.
is Washu U lieing in the MSAR? 😱
Yes, but I think it's telling that Wash U's numbers are so much higher than everyone else's. In last year's MSAR, they were clocking in at a 37 for average acceptees, while everyone else was at a 35 or below. That's a gigantic difference, especially that far out in the curve.Someone's gotta have the highest average matriculant numbers 😀
Yes, but I think it's telling that Wash U's numbers are so much higher than everyone else's. In last year's MSAR, they were clocking in at a 37 for average acceptees, while everyone else was at a 35 or below. That's a gigantic difference, especially that far out in the curve.
Not true, I remember that schools like Hopkins, Michigan, Duke and Stanford, etc. had median MCAT scores above 35. But yes, WashU is consistently on top as far as MCAT scores go, no disagreement with that.
I'd be curious to see what the median MATRICULANT MCAT score is at WashU compared to other places. Good time for someone here to check out the USNWR..
I meant in the '07-'08 MSAR. Let me go look up the one for the cycle that just passed.
yup. I think just to substantiate this - Wash U has a sorta BA/MD program called university scholars
this is their requirement for admissions to MD
those are pretty high standards for a bachelors to md transition, imo
- maintain a 3.8 grade point average (GPA) as an undergraduate student
- complete an application to the School of Medicine the year before entering medical studies
- achieve a total score of 36 on the Medical College Admission Test (MCAT)
- complete a successful interview with the School of Medicines Committee on Admissions.
but its all good, they have great faculty and build great physicians. some schools have different philosophy in picking students - i guess theirs is more objective
Looks like you're not the only one whose brain is offline. I was talking about the purple MSAR which is apparently the '08-'09 one. Whatever. Anyway, the '09-'10 one does have a few schools clocking in at a 37, but Wash U is at a 38. I still find that amazing given how few people score in that range.Oh duh, of course. My reading comprehension skills = fail, today. I have no idea because I don't have that '07-'08 MSAR, just the '09-'10 MSAR (the orange one) and that's where I am getting my info from.
UW SMPH used to have a Med Schoalars program, now discontinued, except it was 3.5 science GPA, MCAT wasn't required except for the final two classes, (must be taken, and minimum 28).
Neither programs require any extracurricular activities, but I think the idea is that with a conditional acceptance, you'd be more likely to participate in EC's
Or drink every night...
there's a guy with 3.92 GPA and 39 MCAT that is waitlisted at WashU, so no, there aren't stats schools.
It's amazing how easily being a salty douche will outweigh a 78.2 LizzyM score...
he doesn't seem like that though, I haven't seen him brag or anything.
It's amazing how easily being a salty douche will outweigh a 78.2 LizzyM score...