- Joined
- Nov 4, 2000
- Messages
- 7,637
- Reaction score
- 361
So there are some really great threads going in this forum right now. Whichever "side" you're on, this is one of the most well thought out and civil debates I've EVER seen on SDN. This kind of professional debate is healthy and constructive. It's good to know that my future collegues are so intelligent, rational, and well spoken.
For those of you who are in the "change in DO education needed" camp (like me), what are we going to do about it? How can we make sure that our criticism of specific aspects of osteopathy is not the misinterpeted as criticism of the entire profession? What can we do to best futhur our cause and ensure that DO's have the brightest future possible? Is the AOA the answer? *How and what can changes can be made in osteopathic medicine that won't be construded as bowing down and giving into powerful hand of allopathic medicine?*
For those of you who are in the "change in DO education needed" camp (like me), what are we going to do about it? How can we make sure that our criticism of specific aspects of osteopathy is not the misinterpeted as criticism of the entire profession? What can we do to best futhur our cause and ensure that DO's have the brightest future possible? Is the AOA the answer? *How and what can changes can be made in osteopathic medicine that won't be construded as bowing down and giving into powerful hand of allopathic medicine?*