Hi all,
I am a rising senior at Columbia and will be taking my DAT July 16. I have been looking through SDN and must say that it has been very helpful in gaining some insight into how the actual exam will be. I have been reaching out to a lot of people who have already applied/been accepted regarding how to approach studying for the DAT. I am currently using Bootcamp, Destroyer, Cliff's AP Bio, Feralis, and Crack PAT. I have also tapped into some other resources including Math formulas and Gen Chem equations (and some other MCAT materials... since my brother is currently studying for his MCAT).
Given that I do not plan to take a gap year and will be applying this cycle (haven't really started my app, was hoping to do so after getting a solid DAT score), I need to do well. I've been studying for probably a month, and averaging 6-7 hours a day (not really sure how efficiently though... but I am definitely getting into a good rhythm).
I was wondering the following:
1) For those of you who have used bootcamp, was it noticeably more difficult than the actual DAT (the general consensus seems to be that it is the same, possibly slightly harder, but never easier). I seem to not be able to do as well as I want to on the RC of bootcamp... getting anywhere between 2-4 wrong on each passage.
2) How difficult is the QR? I took a look at the 2007 QR and it was okay (I managed a 29 or 1x). I do not have the Math Destroyer, but have worked through Bootcamp's exams (which seem to be a bit difficult) and the regular Destroyer's math.
3) How reliable is the actual calculator on the DAT? Do you have the punch in all the numbers/functions/etc via mouse (unable to type the numbers in)?
4) Is Bootcamp's PAT significantly more difficult than the actual DAT? It seems like Bootcamp's aperture focuses on proportions a lot more than Crack PAT does... as in you have to discriminate very small lengths between two answer choices. I seem to be able to manage 13-14/15 on CPD's apertures, but only half or so on Bootcamp's.
5) Are angles arguably easier on the actual DAT than CDP / Bootcamp? Angles are always a crapshoot for me... On the 2007 exam, I got 70/90 questions right on PAT, which was a 20 I believe... 6 of the 20 questions I got wrong were from angles.
I'm in my last week of studying, and have sort of burned out a bit. Looking for some recommendations as to what to do to best prep... I figure just practice practice practice instead of pure content review (which I'll probably do the night before). Reading through SDN has made me feel like everyone's experience with the actual DAT is that it is easier than they expect, or that they do better than they expected they'd do while taking the exam. Hopefully this will be the same for me 😛
My first round of scores on Bootcamp for Bio, GC, OC were all at least 20. I got destroyed by Destroyer my first time through, but I have always considered myself to be strong in the sciences. I just worry that Bio will be insanely random, and then at that point it is kind of out of my hands. Seems like the 2007 exam is easier too, but my scores were 21 Bio (4x), 25 GC (1x), 30 OC (0x), 20 PAT (20x), 21 RC (12x), 29 QR (1x).
Thanks all!
I am a rising senior at Columbia and will be taking my DAT July 16. I have been looking through SDN and must say that it has been very helpful in gaining some insight into how the actual exam will be. I have been reaching out to a lot of people who have already applied/been accepted regarding how to approach studying for the DAT. I am currently using Bootcamp, Destroyer, Cliff's AP Bio, Feralis, and Crack PAT. I have also tapped into some other resources including Math formulas and Gen Chem equations (and some other MCAT materials... since my brother is currently studying for his MCAT).
Given that I do not plan to take a gap year and will be applying this cycle (haven't really started my app, was hoping to do so after getting a solid DAT score), I need to do well. I've been studying for probably a month, and averaging 6-7 hours a day (not really sure how efficiently though... but I am definitely getting into a good rhythm).
I was wondering the following:
1) For those of you who have used bootcamp, was it noticeably more difficult than the actual DAT (the general consensus seems to be that it is the same, possibly slightly harder, but never easier). I seem to not be able to do as well as I want to on the RC of bootcamp... getting anywhere between 2-4 wrong on each passage.
2) How difficult is the QR? I took a look at the 2007 QR and it was okay (I managed a 29 or 1x). I do not have the Math Destroyer, but have worked through Bootcamp's exams (which seem to be a bit difficult) and the regular Destroyer's math.
3) How reliable is the actual calculator on the DAT? Do you have the punch in all the numbers/functions/etc via mouse (unable to type the numbers in)?
4) Is Bootcamp's PAT significantly more difficult than the actual DAT? It seems like Bootcamp's aperture focuses on proportions a lot more than Crack PAT does... as in you have to discriminate very small lengths between two answer choices. I seem to be able to manage 13-14/15 on CPD's apertures, but only half or so on Bootcamp's.
5) Are angles arguably easier on the actual DAT than CDP / Bootcamp? Angles are always a crapshoot for me... On the 2007 exam, I got 70/90 questions right on PAT, which was a 20 I believe... 6 of the 20 questions I got wrong were from angles.
I'm in my last week of studying, and have sort of burned out a bit. Looking for some recommendations as to what to do to best prep... I figure just practice practice practice instead of pure content review (which I'll probably do the night before). Reading through SDN has made me feel like everyone's experience with the actual DAT is that it is easier than they expect, or that they do better than they expected they'd do while taking the exam. Hopefully this will be the same for me 😛
My first round of scores on Bootcamp for Bio, GC, OC were all at least 20. I got destroyed by Destroyer my first time through, but I have always considered myself to be strong in the sciences. I just worry that Bio will be insanely random, and then at that point it is kind of out of my hands. Seems like the 2007 exam is easier too, but my scores were 21 Bio (4x), 25 GC (1x), 30 OC (0x), 20 PAT (20x), 21 RC (12x), 29 QR (1x).
Thanks all!