- Joined
- May 26, 2010
- Messages
- 21
- Reaction score
- 3
Hey folks, just came across contradictory information in FA vs. UWorld concerning the glucose -> sorbitol -> fructose pathway:
UWorld Q#934 says the lens of the eye DOES have sorbitol dehydrogenase whereas FA2012 p. 109 says "Schwann cells, lens, retina, and kidneys have ONLY aldose reductase."
If UWorld is right then this calls into question whether there is sorbitol dehydrogenase in the Schwann cells, retina, and kidneys too. The logic of FA (even if false) however is still very useful in figuring out which tissues are injured in diabetics by osmotic damage...
EDIT: Oops, didn't read the "Educational Objectives" at the bottom before posting this...it seems like UWorld is on top of their stuff. Thanks!
UWorld Q#934 says the lens of the eye DOES have sorbitol dehydrogenase whereas FA2012 p. 109 says "Schwann cells, lens, retina, and kidneys have ONLY aldose reductase."
If UWorld is right then this calls into question whether there is sorbitol dehydrogenase in the Schwann cells, retina, and kidneys too. The logic of FA (even if false) however is still very useful in figuring out which tissues are injured in diabetics by osmotic damage...
EDIT: Oops, didn't read the "Educational Objectives" at the bottom before posting this...it seems like UWorld is on top of their stuff. Thanks!