- Joined
- Sep 7, 2014
- Messages
- 3,384
- Reaction score
- 6,217
This sounds kinda sweet (also, baller)
Anyone have an opinion?
Anyone have an opinion?
Rad onc needs to be exploring low dose RT for Alzheimers
The data look good and some of the anecdotes are incredible
The number of people diagnosed with Alzheimers per year equal the number of new breast and prostate cancer cases combined
I'm wary of a lot of this, BUT am SUPER supportive of trying on trial. Much respect to those who try, but wonder how many failures will make radiation look like a bad idea. I won't lie it is worrisome to low dose Alzheimer's patients, but that's why we try I suppose. Can you link data?
The prognosis for AD is so dismal, and the # of treatments so lacking, I’m surprised there isn’t more support to complete a trial.Looks like the trial from Beaumont is currently suspended due to lack of funding.
ClinicalTrials.gov
clinicaltrials.gov
WBRT + WLI = half body irradiation!Perhaps Emory can do a low dose WBRT for anti-vaxxers in order to finally show a benefit for RT in Covid.
Xrt would be cheaper than the non therapy the FDA approved recentlyAlzheimers is really a huge unmet need, several times larger than cancer, "The Next Pandemic," as one recent article called it.
Good animal data and case reports but no US center has yet to successfully accrue. Would need a solid network effort.
And if XRT were a drug and given its preclinical promise, pharma would have a billion dollar investment (minimum) in it right now.Xrt would be cheaper than the non therapy the FDA approved recently
And if XRT were a drug and given its preclinical promise, pharma would have a billion dollar investment (minimum) in investing in it right now.
(Still expect some leading rad oncs to write an editorial about second cancer risks in 80 year olds getting Alzheimer’s RT.)