Stability of Substituted Alkene vs. Stability of carbocation

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

AmirTimur

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Here is a question from TPR:

What is the IUPAC name of the most stable product that is formed when 1,3-butadiene is reacted with an equal amount of HCl?

Correct Answer:
1-Chloro-2-butene
My answer:
3-Chloro-1-butene

To arrive at the correct answer, double bond from butadiene attacks the H bonded to Cl. Per Markovnikov electrophilic addition, positive charge forms on C3 of diene, while C4 binds to H. Now, if nucleophile Cl attacks at this positive charge, we would have
3-Chloro-1-butene. However, we have resonance occur where double bond becomes subsituted by carbons 2 and 3, with positive charge migrating to carbon 1. Positive charge on carbon is less favorable than positive charge on carbon 3 (1 vs. 2 carbons). If positive charge forms on carbon 1, nucleophile Cl attacks, forming the 1-Chloro-2-butene, TPR's answer.

Can someone explain to me please, why we are favoring stability of double bond over stability of the positive charge?

Thanks so much in advance!

 
http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Wikitex..._Dienes-Kinetic_and_Thermodynamic_Control_III

"More stable" means thermodynamic product, I guess. It's more stable because the double bond is disubstituted.

More information on slides 24 through 28: http://higheredbcs.wiley.com/legacy/college/solomons/0471417998/ppt/ch13.ppt

Wow, thanks for the links. Kinetic vs. Thermodynamic makes sense. What doesn't make sense is TPR's automatic assumption that the product was thermodynamic.

Спасибо, Брат!
 
Top