Strawberrylover
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2020
- Messages
- 32
- Reaction score
- 20
Those of you in optho-when in m4 did you do CS and CK? When are most interviews? Dont want them clashing. Would appreciate any tips
Not in ophtho but you should do CS ASAP regardless of specialty. Schedule it now if you are applying this year. It may even be too late to get a good date.
Yes, even applying for CS in March my earliest dates were Oct-NovYou can’t be serious. We have to compete to get a decent spot for this stupid ass test too?
Yeah. It's extremely difficult to get a good date for CS. You should be thinking about it about a year in advance.You can’t be serious. We have to compete to get a decent spot for this stupid ass test too?
You can’t be serious. We have to compete to get a decent spot for this stupid ass test too?
if I take december off n most IV's are in november...is that doable...with ck @ end of dec?I think its best to hit the sweet spot where you don't get your score in time for apps (assuming your step 1 is competitive). Don't push it till december or you'll be miserable during the interview season studying
Those of you in optho-when in m4 did you do CS and CK? When are most interviews? Dont want them clashing. Would appreciate any tips
I think its best to hit the sweet spot where you don't get your score in time for apps (assuming your step 1 is competitive). Don't push it till december or you'll be miserable during the interview season studying
The below is a bad strategy for CK if applying ophtho, as its clear you either 1) werent truly committed or 2) were worried about a bad score.
if I take december off n most IV's are in november...is that doable...with ck @ end of dec?
You clearly don't know what you're talking about. PD's for the most part don't care for CK score if you have a good step 1.
You clearly don't know what you're talking about. PD's for the most part don't care for CK score if you have a good step 1.
You clearly don't know what you're talking about. PD's for the most part don't care for CK score if you have a good step 1.
Nah, med students are more in the know.Dude you're talking to an ophtho attending. I'll take his word over yours anytime.
Pre-meds even more soNah, med students are more in the know.
Dude you're talking to an ophtho attending. I'll take his word over yours anytime.
This really makes it look like you know your sh#t 🙄I just applied and matched in ophtho this cycle and have talked multiple applicants from my school and around the country.
Oh, come on! You're almost there! Don't just half douche, go all the way. Drop some rankings. Top 5? Top 10? Top 20? where'd these people match?I've also seen where said people have matched.
A missing Step 2 in January is a failed Step 2 until proven otherwise.
Yeahhh I know at least when I was applying for residency people were asking for step 2 scores before they made rank lists. People would ask when you were planning to take step 2 on interview day.
From my (very limited) knowledge PDs seemed to want as complete of an application as possible. I talked to 2 PDs and an APD about my application and all of them said they wanted to see a complete app submitted by Sept 15 with everything passed. One even said they do not offer interviews to candidates who don't have a complete app submitted within a week of it opening because they have so many applicants to choose from that they can be picky about less organized people.
10 years ago I was hearing med students and residents say to only take Step 2 before applying if you felt like you needed to make up for Step 1. The last 5 years I've been hearing more and more people saying that having a Step 2 score at the time of application is important. I could certainly be wrong, but the trends in CTO and the PD surveys seem to back up the statements I've heard about that trend.
Declining to interview and declining to rank are two VERY separate things. We will almost certainly invite USMD/DOs with Step I passed and Step II missing in the fall, especially if they're coming from our region. But we won't rank them without a passed Step II.
We also will interview local people without step II, but I tell them they will not be ranked without step II. Programs could easily filter out everyone without step II and they still would only be able to interview a fraction of the applicant pool. This is mostly an artifact of people applying to more and more places, but it is true.
When should you take step 2 Ck if you have a strong step 1 score? Most people say to delay it but I’ve also heard this advice is outdated and programs want to see it before interviews.
I think its best to hit the sweet spot where you don't get your score in time for apps (assuming your step 1 is competitive).
The below is a bad strategy for CK if applying ophtho, as its clear you either 1) were worried about a bad score.
Not enough info to lend an opinion other than I always recommend US MD applicants not take ck until the results would come out AFTER applications are sent out. This bites someone every year.
PD's for the most part don't care for CK score if you have a good step 1.
TexasPhysician is right unless you are interviewing with a PD who has been burned by matching someone who then failed step II and couldn't graduate. Some PDs have learned from hard knocks to not rank applicants who don't have step II. I guess the best answer is always take step II unless you are going to fail it. Of course that isn't so easy to know.
If I see advice on here contrary to what is actually happening I'll say something against it.
That's great. I just applied and matched in ophtho this cycle and have talked multiple applicants from my school and around the country. I've also seen where said people have matched. If I see advice on here contrary to what is actually happening I'll say something against it.
You clearly don't know what you're talking about. PD's for the most part don't care for CK score if you have a good step 1.
This really makes it look like you know your sh#t 🙄
Oh, come on! You're almost there! Don't just half douche, go all the way. Drop some rankings. Top 5? Top 10? Top 20? where'd these people match?
Based on what you've said your advice is from the success you and the MuLtIpLe aPpLiCaNtS from all around the country have experienced in one cycle. He's telling OP from his experience and from what he's seen over the years.
Multiple People have also agreed with doc above
These posts are not specifically related to CK and optho, but it shows how important having a score is.
@PantherPride why are you encouraging OP to not take the exam early enough to have to include scores in their app if you think CK scores aren't that important? 🤔
Texas Physician again proves cub's point about why people avoid taking CK earlier. PD's are gonna start catching on.
PD's do care about CK scores. If they weren't important they would have made them pass fail. It's unlikely that people with high Step 1 scores will fail CK but PD's are probably worried about failures too. A failing CK (depending on how late you take it) can mean you don't graduate. If you don't graduate, you obviously can't start residency.
Well you're gonna be fighting a lot of people on this. You're not the end all be all. You do not know everything. Someone tried to point out that the person above you might actually know a thing or two about what they're talking about and instead being professional and saying
"Okay, I understand that this is what worked for them, but this is what worked for me and the MuLtIpLe aPpLiCaNtS I've spoken to from all around the country let's agree to disagree". You went on to undermine what that person said and their years of experience by saying that you know more because of your success in the cycle and then hinted that you know multiple people who got into great programs so you all obviously know more.
It doesn't matter how GREAT of a program your friends got into, every program is not the same. There are tons of different programs across the country. What worked for you and your friends may not work for everyone. @cubsrule4e is trying to tell OP to get their app as complete as possible to give themselves as best a shot as possible. Honestly, with a specialty as competitive as optho it's not bad advice.
You know, I thought premeds outgrew their I 'know everything' phase but you unfortunately proved to me that that's not always the case.
You're four years out from premed. You're grooooown and you're gonna be someone's doctor. I sincerly hope that this is just your internet personality.
This post is now outdated with P/F Step 1. Even then, I'll still get the advice from an attending who knows the process and the requirements involved. If an ophtho PD stops by with countering advice, I'll take note of that and be better prepared.
You're still missing my point, but okay.I bet it felt great writing your tirade/ad hominem, but you continue to miss the point. Ophtho is different from the general application process. For prelim medicine you need your step 2 score to match. For ophtho you don't (assuming a strong step 1). Period. I'll write it in this thread, not because I care to change your mind, but because there's a lot of people applying ophtho next year who will read this thread and will be misinformed if they go off of some other posts.
Also, it's hilarious if you think simply being an attending graces you with wisdom of the current application process. If you talk to three different attendings they'll give you three different strategies for the residency process. Don't know where you are in training but hopefully you're smart enough to parse out what is good and bad advice in making your own decisions.
You're still missing my point, but okay.
No way! I was using my air of superiority to point out your air of superiority!!It was hard to find under your air of superiority