- Joined
- Sep 6, 2002
- Messages
- 5,046
- Reaction score
- 8
I need some opinions about something. I took my first physics class (Physics 6A) this past winter quarter and I am taking the second class, Physics 6B, this spring. I was planning on taking my final physics class this summer at UC Riverside... UCLA has already told me that Physics 2C at UCR would be equivalent to Physics 6C at UCLA and that I will get credit for it. However, I was looking at the list of topics for 2C and 6C and a lot of things are quite different. A lot of stuff covered in 2C will be covered in 6B, which I am taking this spring. And a lot of stuff covered in 6C isn't covered in 2C.
I am kind of skeptical now. How important is it that all of the topics of 6C and 2C are the same? Would it be wiser to just take Physics 6C next fall at UCLA? If so, I can just take a GE or something at UCR this summer. I just don't want to be messed up for the MCAT by not having learned all of the information that will be included.
Thanks for any help!
I am kind of skeptical now. How important is it that all of the topics of 6C and 2C are the same? Would it be wiser to just take Physics 6C next fall at UCLA? If so, I can just take a GE or something at UCR this summer. I just don't want to be messed up for the MCAT by not having learned all of the information that will be included.
Thanks for any help!