- Joined
- Nov 24, 2003
- Messages
- 73
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
This is driving me crazy!
In CaseFiles it says in bold, "The best initial diagnostic test for an esophageal rupture is a water-soluble contrast esophagogram ... water-soluble contrast is preferred b/c it causes less mediastinal irritation than barium"
and then in A&L, it says, "The esophagogram should not be conducted with Gastrografin because of its deleterious effects if aspirated into the lungs. Either an esophagoscopy or barium swallow should be used to r/o esophageal injury."
???
And then for traumatic rupture of the aorta, CaseFiles says no one uses aortogram b/c of it's invasiveness and it requires a separate team -- we should use spiral CT to diagnose, and then A&L says we should use an aortogram.
What the heck? Anyone else encountering stuff like this? 😕
I have my shelf in two weeks, wish me luck 🙄
In CaseFiles it says in bold, "The best initial diagnostic test for an esophageal rupture is a water-soluble contrast esophagogram ... water-soluble contrast is preferred b/c it causes less mediastinal irritation than barium"
and then in A&L, it says, "The esophagogram should not be conducted with Gastrografin because of its deleterious effects if aspirated into the lungs. Either an esophagoscopy or barium swallow should be used to r/o esophageal injury."
???
And then for traumatic rupture of the aorta, CaseFiles says no one uses aortogram b/c of it's invasiveness and it requires a separate team -- we should use spiral CT to diagnose, and then A&L says we should use an aortogram.
What the heck? Anyone else encountering stuff like this? 😕
I have my shelf in two weeks, wish me luck 🙄