- Joined
- May 19, 2009
- Messages
- 72
- Reaction score
- 0
18 credits, 5 A's and 1 A- = 3.95 whyyyyyyyyyyyyyy!!!!!
18 credits, 5 A's and 1 A- = 3.95 whyyyyyyyyyyyyyy!!!!!
18 credits, 5 A's and 1 A- = 3.95 whyyyyyyyyyyyyyy!!!!!
I always get A-'s.... thank God I'm in Texas
Which is why I believe an A is an A. The +/- grading system should only apply to B's below.
I used to hate the +/- system, but in all honesty, it's fair. The difficulty between maintaining an 89 average and an 80 average should be acknowledged. Similarly, getting a 90 vs getting a 95 should be acknowledged.
18 credits, 5 A's and 1 A- = 3.95 whyyyyyyyyyyyyyy!!!!!
I used to hate the +/- system, but in all honesty, it's fair. The difficulty between maintaining an 89 average and an 80 average should be acknowledged. Similarly, getting a 90 vs getting a 95 should be acknowledged.
First world problems...
At my school :
4.0: 85-100
3.7: 80-84
3.3: 77-79
3.0: 73-75
2.7: 68-72
2.3: 62-66
But the Professors' make it their duty to make sure only a couple of people actually get an 85+
18 credits, 5 A's and 1 A- = 3.95 whyyyyyyyyyyyyyy!!!!!
At my school :
4.0: 85-100
3.7: 80-84
3.3: 77-79
3.0: 73-75
2.7: 68-72
2.3: 62-66
But the Professors' make it their duty to make sure only a couple of people actually get an 85+
I assume U of T.
If by couple, you mean 10-15% minimum...
My only gripe with the system is the lack of an A+. I know it doesn't work with the 4.0 system but it would be nice if acing a class did a little more for you. It also invites professors to make strict A/A- cutoffs, like at 95% in my anatomy class.
+1. Just scraping by with a 90 shouldn't give you a 4.0 A.
WTF I'd be happy if +/- was 3.95. Ours is 3.7 without the extra .05. 🙁
Other than that, I usually get A's in the 92's or 93's so I don't like having to work extra hard to get a 94 or up to get a solid A when other people can get a 90.1 or even 89.7 and get the same letter grade.
It does blow.
At my school :
4.0: 85-100
3.7: 80-84
3.3: 77-79
3.0: 73-75
2.7: 68-72
2.3: 62-66
But the Professors' make it their duty to make sure only a couple of people actually get an 85+
I agree and I had maaannnnyyy A-'s during my undergraduate career. I would have hated making a 89.04 and then getting a B, while the a different person got the same grade with an 81.0.I used to hate the +/- system, but in all honesty, it's fair. The difficulty between maintaining an 89 average and an 80 average should be acknowledged. Similarly, getting a 90 vs getting a 95 should be acknowledged.
Agree here. The gap for non +/- is pretty huge. Which can be frustrating sometimes. Which is why I wonder what constitutes an A-.I agree and I had maaannnnyyy A-'s during my undergraduate career. I would have hated making a 89.04 and then getting a B, while the a different person got the same grade with an 81.0.
18 credits, 5 A's and 1 A- = 3.95 whyyyyyyyyyyyyyy!!!!!
They should eliminate this grading system and just put down your final score on a 100 point scale.
Our school allows each professor to decide if they want to or do not want to use the +/- system. Typically a 94% or lower is an A-.
+1. Just scraping by with a 90 shouldn't give you a 4.0 A.
I hope you realize a lot of grading systems in graduate and medical fields go by
90=A
80=B
70=C
...
18 credits, 5 A's and 1 A- = 3.95 whyyyyyyyyyyyyyy!!!!!
Oh. At my school, undergrad (pre-3rd year pharm) is 93=A, etc. Then we enter the real world where 90=A and scaled in such fashion.
They should eliminate this grading system and just put down your final score on a 100 point scale.
I wish my school had that scale 🙁 ..... I've heard U of T is seriously hard to actually get A's in though![]()
I assume U of T.
If by couple, you mean 10-15% minimum...
But then it's only fair if you acknowledge the difference in every direction and make an A+ a 4.0 and an A worth less.I used to hate the +/- system, but in all honesty, it's fair. The difficulty between maintaining an 89 average and an 80 average should be acknowledged. Similarly, getting a 90 vs getting a 95 should be acknowledged.
WTF? That's pathetic. 👎One of my classes the average was a 3.0 (which apparently is too high for UofT) and the office of registrar told the Professor to bell-curve everyone down, but he didn't.
Definitely agree. It would be more fair that way.
I also think the MCAT shouldn't be scaled. Just give a raw score on each section. For example - Missing 6 and missing 12 on a section might both give someone a 10, meanwhile - missing 5 grants an 11. It's silly. Just add the raw scores.
But then it's only fair if you acknowledge the difference in every direction and make an A+ a 4.0 and an A worth less.
WTF? That's pathetic. 👎
Props to the professor for understanding the purpose of grading though. 👍