That glorious moment...

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

HeronsBeak

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2012
Messages
400
Reaction score
53
Points
4,691
Location
The continental US
  1. Medical Student
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
When you find out that AACOMAS science GPA only uses BCP instead of BCPM and your sGPA instantly jumps .2.:soexcited::zip:
 
Mine jumped like 0.5 points
 
Don't forget grade replacement. The greatest magic of all AACOMAS :laugh:
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Not glorious for me. My AMCAS science gpa is a full 0.1 higher than my ACCOMAS one
 
Also BCP is given more leniency for AACOMAS, such as nutrition classes counting as Bio 😀

I took a medical terminology class that I'm PRAYING will hold up as a science/bio course next cycle. It's the difference between a 3.51sci and a 3.48sci for me. Peanuts, I know, but I feel like every tenth of a grade point is a huge deal. 3.5 seems much higher than 3.48 to someone glancing through stacks of apps.
 
I think it reduced my Sgpa by a .1, 10 credits of A's off my gpa 🙁
 
Having engineering count as sGPA hurts pretty good, a mountain of B- to A- isn't moved very far by another one of As. AMCAS sGPA will be higher than AACOMAS. :laugh:
 
I took a medical terminology class that I'm PRAYING will hold up as a science/bio course next cycle. It's the difference between a 3.51sci and a 3.48sci for me. Peanuts, I know, but I feel like every tenth of a grade point is a huge deal. 3.5 seems much higher than 3.48 to someone glancing through stacks of apps.

I am 90% sure that med term is specifically specified as a non-science 😳
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I am 90% sure that med term is specifically specified as a non-science 😳

"specifically specified"... nice work, self.

Fuuuuuuu.

It wasn't in the college of Bio, but it was completely systems based.

Yeah mine was in the general "Health Professions" category. You can try marking it that way, but it's hard to challenge something AACOMAS put down on paper.
 
Yeah, you're right. I looked it up and it said it's typically non-science.

I'm going to mark it as other science, as to me it was 100% science with all of the physiology, anatomy, histology, and path we covered. If they want to change it, that's up to them, but it still sucks I'm right on the edge like that.
 
Top Bottom