The Insanity of Vituity

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Making that amount depends on the volume and use of a PA and most importantly your collections. If you collect $200/pt and you see 2.2 pph thats 440/hr and if your PAs see 1.5pph thats another 300/hr and lets say the cost of employing them is 120/hr (if you include benefits etc). if you are very doc heavy that PA income can offset expenses fully, if you staff PA heavy it can lead to more profit for docs.

Making 400+ isnt a pipedream but the main factor IMO is your $/pt. It is certainly challenging to collect $200/pt but I know groups (not my own unfortunately that have historically been able to do 250 and another at 300, this makes 200 a possibility tho difficult in this environment.
Agree on the key components: volume, collection/patient and PA/NP utilization.

We collect north of $200/patient. Some physicians break the $400-500/hour mark by working “harder” (I don’t consider 2-2.5 pph exceptionally hard). while others prefer a more relaxed pace of 1.7-1.9/hour. That’s also the beauty of a small democratic group in that you can have some variability of practice by choice. We also are physician heavy group by choice. We could employ an army of midlevels, but prefer to see patients directly acknowledging some loss of potential profit.

Those three key details are what make a SDG better. 1) Collection/patient goes to the physician and not skimmed off the top. 2) You can staff volume to preference. 3) You can choose how you want to employee midlevels.
 
Last edited:
Agree on the key components: volume, collection/patient and PA/NP utilization.

We collect north of $200/patient. Some physicians break the $400-500/hour mark by working “harder” (I don’t consider 2-2.5 pph exceptionally hard). while others prefer a more relaxed pace of 1.7-1.9/hour. That’s also the beauty of a small democratic group in that you can have some variability of practice by choice. We also are physician heavy group by choice. We could employ an arm of midlevels, but prefer to see patients directly acknowledging some loss of potential profit.

Those three key details are what make a SDG better. 1) Collection/patient goes to the physician and not skimmed off the top. 2) You can staff volume to preference. 3) You can choose how you want to employee midlevels.
Agreed all around.. my point is making 4-500/hr isnt some insane number for an SDG.. then compare to the CMG shops. Heavy midlevel use, and sub $300/hr pay.. they know how to collect from patients.
 
For a while I tried to pursue jobs in admin thinking that I would be able to effect changes for the better. That was until I realized that effecting real change for the better would involve a career trajectory that looked more Fidel Castro than a management minion.
 
For a while I tried to pursue jobs in admin thinking that I would be able to effect changes for the better. That was until I realized that effecting real change for the better would involve a career trajectory that looked more Fidel Castro than a management minion.
Yeah. Its a catch 22.. As docs we hate answering to Walden U grads and other similar mouth breathers. On the other hand most of the docs who enter the hospital admin world quickly lose touch with what seeing patients is really all about and the challenges we face.

I debated pursuing this but it would come with both a pay cut and spending time doing things I hate. Now with zoom meetings it is even worse.
 
Just gtfo'd from a burnout inducing HCA shop where I was working FT. Looks like I was onto something before others saw the writing on the wall. Medical director now stepping down, their 6th in 5 years. I'm pretty sure they will end up hiring someone fresh out of residency - I say 90% chance this happens. The other 2 FT docs that remained also going PRN.
 
Yeah. Its a catch 22.. As docs we hate answering to Walden U grads and other similar mouth breathers. On the other hand most of the docs who enter the hospital admin world quickly lose touch with what seeing patients is really all about and the challenges we face.

I debated pursuing this but it would come with both a pay cut and spending time doing things I hate. Now with zoom meetings it is even worse.
Many hospital systems are now requiring their physician leaders to do clinical time. It might be one shift a month but it’s something
 
Damn SDG bros... 4-500/hr? Seriously? Sigh.

I'm just destined to always be a CMG pleb.

pauper begging child GIF


Entered EM in rags and apparently will leave EM in rags.
 
Many hospital systems are now requiring their physician leaders to do clinical time. It might be one shift a month but it’s something
Meh. I’m unimpressed. You literally don’t have enough time to work shifts and be a significant admin physician at a decent sized hospital.
 
SDG jobs are routinely advertised at like $200-$250/hr as "dream" or "forever" gigs on emdocs jobs. EM is cooked.
I think this is because the high paying ones don’t say what they make. I know a fair number of different SDGs across the country making 400+. I also know the ones you mention. I don’t understand why someone would want to work at an SDG for crap pay no matter how awesome it is.
 
I think this is because the high paying ones don’t say what they make. I know a fair number of different SDGs across the country making 400+. I also know the ones you mention. I don’t understand why someone would want to work at an SDG for crap pay no matter how awesome it is.
Sometimes I think I'd like to make more but then I appreciate that I have time to do my job and usually take breaks etc
 
Sometimes I think I'd like to make more but then I appreciate that I have time to do my job and usually take breaks etc
Not sure one is correlated with the other. IMO could see how groups make $400/hr and see 1.8 pph or a little less and not be overly reliant on MLPs.

Then again, I dont think thats the rule.. thats definitely the exception. Hustle more.. make more.. My old group we did pretty well. Docs Averaged about 1.8pph i said why dont we cut our staffing some and we could increase our pay by 10%. Group was happy earning well.
 
Sometimes I think I'd like to make more but then I appreciate that I have time to do my job and usually take breaks etc
This. Like I'm sorry man, I need to take at least 20 minutes away from the madness to eat my meal in peace, so I can function like a damn human being. Not get bombarded over walkie talkies to come back and sign a normal sinus ekg, or because 5 non emergent patients have checked in and the MLP is throwing a hissy fit. Yes, this was my last gig which I left as soon as I possibly could. I don't know if i'm coming back to a hospital ED again.
 
Not sure one is correlated with the other. IMO could see how groups make $400/hr and see 1.8 pph or a little less and not be overly reliant on MLPs.

Then again, I dont think thats the rule.. thats definitely the exception. Hustle more.. make more.. My old group we did pretty well. Docs Averaged about 1.8pph i said why dont we cut our staffing some and we could increase our pay by 10%. Group was happy earning well.
I think part of it is that a good chunk of our shifts are rural and at a contracted rate. Honestly makes my life better anyway.
 
You private groups that are making so much...are you getting a hospital subsidy? The math just breaks down for me. If average capture per pt encounter is $150-200 which would be standard, how are you running the practice and finding enough revenue to pay the docs 400/hr +/-? I mean, every way I slice it with AI analyzing, business operations and malpractice alone should be around 30% right? Let's assume a really efficient practice with 70% of the revenue split between the docs, assuming 2pph on average... and let's assume you're getting $200/pt, that only leaves $280/hr for the doc. Where are you guys getting the extra money?

The only thing that would make sense to me is a hospital subsidy or some sort of ponzi scheme with a long sweat equity partnership track where you are axing 50% of the docs their last year to earn partner. Am I missing something? Does your patient population have the best payor mix in the country?
 
You private groups that are making so much...are you getting a hospital subsidy? The math just breaks down for me. If average capture per pt encounter is $150-200 which would be standard, how are you running the practice and finding enough revenue to pay the docs 400/hr +/-? I mean, every way I slice it with AI analyzing, business operations and malpractice alone should be around 30% right? Let's assume a really efficient practice with 70% of the revenue split between the docs, assuming 2pph on average... and let's assume you're getting $200/pt, that only leaves $280/hr for the doc. Where are you guys getting the extra money?

The only thing that would make sense to me is a hospital subsidy or some sort of ponzi scheme with a long sweat equity partnership track where you are axing 50% of the docs their last year to earn partner. Am I missing something? Does your patient population have the best payor mix in the country?
We have a looong partnership track, but our docs working towards partnership all make it if they want to stay long enough. There is a set number of shifts, so a real end point. We also have APPs. We get incentives for certain metrics if we meet them-the hospital sets those. Our group average pph is 2-2.6 depending on the month. I've been mid to high $3s the last few years working about 12/month, some of our docs that work more and hustle waaay more on shift are almost double that. I don't know what to tell you, but we make it work.

For me? It's still not enough. I'd keep doing it for anesthesia pay, but for what we make? Ugh. The fact that EM hasn't been able to push for higher or at least real improvement in our wRVU rate for so long is gross. It's not fair for what we have to do and how we are expected to do it.

There's no way in hell I'd do it for much less than I'm making now though. It's a scam.
 
We have a looong partnership track, but our docs working towards partnership all make it if they want to stay long enough. There is a set number of shifts, so a real end point. We also have APPs. We get incentives for certain metrics if we meet them-the hospital sets those. Our group average pph is 2-2.6 depending on the month. I've been mid to high $3s the last few years working about 12/month, some of our docs that work more and hustle waaay more on shift are almost double that. I don't know what to tell you, but we make it work.

For me? It's still not enough. I'd keep doing it for anesthesia pay, but for what we make? Ugh. The fact that EM hasn't been able to push for higher or at least real improvement in our wRVU rate for so long is gross. It's not fair for what we have to do and how we are expected to do it.

There's no way in hell I'd do it for much less than I'm making now though. It's a scam.

Ah. The partnership track and APPs is helping AI to figure out the math. That makes more sense. Maybe if its a larger group that would reduce individual physician overhead and perhaps I'm overestimating business operational expenses. Thanks.

Depressing.
 
You private groups that are making so much...are you getting a hospital subsidy? The math just breaks down for me. If average capture per pt encounter is $150-200 which would be standard, how are you running the practice and finding enough revenue to pay the docs 400/hr +/-? I mean, every way I slice it with AI analyzing, business operations and malpractice alone should be around 30% right? Let's assume a really efficient practice with 70% of the revenue split between the docs, assuming 2pph on average... and let's assume you're getting $200/pt, that only leaves $280/hr for the doc. Where are you guys getting the extra money?

The only thing that would make sense to me is a hospital subsidy or some sort of ponzi scheme with a long sweat equity partnership track where you are axing 50% of the docs their last year to earn partner. Am I missing something? Does your patient population have the best payor mix in the country?
It's a several year partner track. Rarely we have a doc that is not going to make partner, even after remediation, we try to part ways as soon as this is apparent. It's happened one time in most of a decade. We aggressively remediate whenever possible and will rarely delay a partner vote by a year if there are concerns. We're probably less than 20% partner track docs at any given time. We make some money off partner track docs and some from PAs.

We don't get a traditional subsidy but do get some incentive pay for meeting some agreed upon goals annually. We get a flat contracted rate at the rural sites that drags our average pay down a bit but makes life better. I actually don't know our total overhead costs and don't care enough to go investigate the books but think I could probably pull it out of our last financial update if I had any interest.
 
My group is entirely keep what you kill. There is zero "partner benefit."

Income = whatever you collect - overhead + whatever the PA collects under your name - the portion of their salary you pay for.

I was on track to make about 650k before I left to go to fellowship and was working 1530 hrs/yr. That's about 425/hr.

That said, I was also seeing 2.77 pts/hr solo, plus what the midlevel was seeing with me. This was... unsustainable.
 
My group is entirely keep what you kill. There is zero "partner benefit."

Income = whatever you collect - overhead + whatever the PA collects under your name - the portion of their salary you pay for.

I was on track to make about 650k before I left to go to fellowship and was working 1530 hrs/yr. That's about 425/hr.

That said, I was also seeing 2.77 pts/hr solo, plus what the midlevel was seeing with me. This was... unsustainable.
Anytime we have a couple of people push 2 pph in any shift in a month, staffing discussions end up in our monthly meeting
 
You private groups that are making so much...are you getting a hospital subsidy? The math just breaks down for me. If average capture per pt encounter is $150-200 which would be standard, how are you running the practice and finding enough revenue to pay the docs 400/hr +/-? I mean, every way I slice it with AI analyzing, business operations and malpractice alone should be around 30% right? Let's assume a really efficient practice with 70% of the revenue split between the docs, assuming 2pph on average... and let's assume you're getting $200/pt, that only leaves $280/hr for the doc. Where are you guys getting the extra money?

The only thing that would make sense to me is a hospital subsidy or some sort of ponzi scheme with a long sweat equity partnership track where you are axing 50% of the docs their last year to earn partner. Am I missing something? Does your patient population have the best payor mix in the country?
I'm not sure what you mean by "business operations" but Emergency Medicine is a pretty simple business. See patients and then collect. 30% for that would be a massively inefficient practice. The numbers you are seeing would be total compensation so would include everything (health insurance, HSA, profit sharing, etc.). Granted, $400/hr+ is in the unicorn category and you aren't going to be sitting around doing nothing and will also have midlevels.
 
I'm not sure what you mean by "business operations" but Emergency Medicine is a pretty simple business. See patients and then collect. 30% for that would be a massively inefficient practice. The numbers you are seeing would be total compensation so would include everything (health insurance, HSA, profit sharing, etc.). Granted, $400/hr+ is in the unicorn category and you aren't going to be sitting around doing nothing and will also have midlevels.
  • Administrative Costs:
    • Billing and Coding (4–7%): EM groups rely heavily on accurate coding due to complex ED visit levels. Outsourcing billing services costs 4–7% of collections (MGMA data, 2021). In-house billing (common in smaller groups) may reduce this to 3–5%, but staff salaries offset savings. Assume 5% of revenue.
    • Practice Management (5–10%): Includes a practice manager (~$80K–$120K/year), billing staff, and HR functions (e.g., scheduling, payroll). For a 5-physician group generating $5M, 1–2 full-time staff cost ~$200K/year, or 4% of revenue. Additional costs for IT (EHR licenses, scheduling software) and accounting/legal fees add ~2–4%. Assume 7% total.
    • Medical Director Stipend (2–4%): Many EM groups pay a physician to serve as medical director, handling hospital relations and quality assurance. Stipends range from $50K–$200K/year, depending on group size and hours. For a $5M group, assume $100K, or 2% of revenue.
    • Eliminated Costs: No receptionists (ED clerks are hospital staff), no office rent, no utilities. This eliminates ~5–10% of overhead typical for outpatient practices (e.g., MGMA reports rent at 5–7% for primary care).
    • Total Administrative: ~14–16% (5% billing + 7% management + 3% director stipend), down from the original 20–30% estimate, reflecting the leaner hospital-based model.
  • Malpractice Insurance (5–10%):
    • Unchanged from prior estimate. EM premiums range from $15K–$30K/year per physician (Medscape 2019, adjusted to ~$20K–$35K in 2025 for inflation). For a 5-physician group, $100K–$175K total, or 5–7% of $5M revenue in moderate-risk states (e.g., TX, CA). High-litigation states (e.g., NY, FL) may hit 8–10%. Hospital subsidies or group policies often lower costs. Assume 7%, consistent with your high-income context.
  • Other Operational Expenses:
    • Credentialing and Compliance (1–2%): Costs for physician licensing, hospital privileging, and compliance (e.g., HIPAA, CMS audits) are minimal but necessary. Assume $50K/year for a 5-physician group, or 1% of $5M revenue.
    • Recruiting and Training (1–2%): EM groups face turnover (especially in high-burnout settings), incurring costs for job postings, locum tenens, or onboarding. Assume $50K/year, or 1%.
    • Supplies and Miscellaneous (1–2%): Minimal, as the hospital provides most ED supplies (e.g., monitors, medications). Costs may include group-specific software or CME allowances. Assume 1%.
    • Total Operational: ~3–5%, down from 10–15%, as hospital-based EM groups have fewer direct expenses.
That's from the AI. I know some of that will be wrong like they probably aren't paying for a full salary practice manager or HR personnel, etc.. and you are probably outsourcing the billing but is that super far off? I don't know anything about running a practice... I guess the EHR costs would be paid by the hospital along with the licenses, etc.. Probably aren't paying for locums docs as well. Maybe it's way off.
 
That's from the AI. I know some of that will be wrong like they probably aren't paying for a full salary practice manager or HR personnel, etc.. and you are probably outsourcing the billing but is that super far off? I don't know anything about running a practice... I guess the EHR costs would be paid by the hospital along with the licenses, etc.. Probably aren't paying for locums docs as well. Maybe it's way off.
AI certainly gave you numbers but there's a lot of errors in there. Billing is about the only one you can reliably use as a percentage of revenue. I've got to say, the more I see from AI the less impressed I am with it.
 
Our scheduling costs, medical director costs, etc are a little more difficult to tease out. We basically pay them up to a certain number of hours at a set rate. We also have a lot of hospital/system committee contracts that the group collects payment on and we get paid for the number of actual hours we spend on those activities.
 
  • Administrative Costs:
    • Billing and Coding (4–7%): EM groups rely heavily on accurate coding due to complex ED visit levels. Outsourcing billing services costs 4–7% of collections (MGMA data, 2021). In-house billing (common in smaller groups) may reduce this to 3–5%, but staff salaries offset savings. Assume 5% of revenue.
    • Practice Management (5–10%): Includes a practice manager (~$80K–$120K/year), billing staff, and HR functions (e.g., scheduling, payroll). For a 5-physician group generating $5M, 1–2 full-time staff cost ~$200K/year, or 4% of revenue. Additional costs for IT (EHR licenses, scheduling software) and accounting/legal fees add ~2–4%. Assume 7% total.
    • Medical Director Stipend (2–4%): Many EM groups pay a physician to serve as medical director, handling hospital relations and quality assurance. Stipends range from $50K–$200K/year, depending on group size and hours. For a $5M group, assume $100K, or 2% of revenue.
    • Eliminated Costs: No receptionists (ED clerks are hospital staff), no office rent, no utilities. This eliminates ~5–10% of overhead typical for outpatient practices (e.g., MGMA reports rent at 5–7% for primary care).
    • Total Administrative: ~14–16% (5% billing + 7% management + 3% director stipend), down from the original 20–30% estimate, reflecting the leaner hospital-based model.
  • Malpractice Insurance (5–10%):
    • Unchanged from prior estimate. EM premiums range from $15K–$30K/year per physician (Medscape 2019, adjusted to ~$20K–$35K in 2025 for inflation). For a 5-physician group, $100K–$175K total, or 5–7% of $5M revenue in moderate-risk states (e.g., TX, CA). High-litigation states (e.g., NY, FL) may hit 8–10%. Hospital subsidies or group policies often lower costs. Assume 7%, consistent with your high-income context.
  • Other Operational Expenses:
    • Credentialing and Compliance (1–2%): Costs for physician licensing, hospital privileging, and compliance (e.g., HIPAA, CMS audits) are minimal but necessary. Assume $50K/year for a 5-physician group, or 1% of $5M revenue.
    • Recruiting and Training (1–2%): EM groups face turnover (especially in high-burnout settings), incurring costs for job postings, locum tenens, or onboarding. Assume $50K/year, or 1%.
    • Supplies and Miscellaneous (1–2%): Minimal, as the hospital provides most ED supplies (e.g., monitors, medications). Costs may include group-specific software or CME allowances. Assume 1%.
    • Total Operational: ~3–5%, down from 10–15%, as hospital-based EM groups have fewer direct expenses.
That's from the AI. I know some of that will be wrong like they probably aren't paying for a full salary practice manager or HR personnel, etc.. and you are probably outsourcing the billing but is that super far off? I don't know anything about running a practice... I guess the EHR costs would be paid by the hospital along with the licenses, etc.. Probably aren't paying for locums docs as well. Maybe it's way off.
I love AI but it’s broken here. It’s not smart enough to parse out EM vs others.

I’ll help you with some real numbers. Billing and coding is $7-9/chart. I know some are cheaper and I know a handful above that range. I will say simply driving this number down may not be great as some of the “cheap” companies code crappily and it is a case of penny wise and pound foolish.
Practice management at 5-10% is rich. I would tighten it to 4-7% (after hospital portion for medical directors). I include medical director money in practice management. I did a deep dive with a large national RCM and I got data (blinded) from a bunch of their practices. 3-6% was the range. Much depends on the size of the group but that was the range for groups similar in size to mine.

Note for med mal they are assuming $5m in revenue for 5 docs.. insane.. but med mal is roughly 20k in most states. Im sure in some it is more.. but a good rough estimate is $5-$6 per patient.

For “Other” RCM companies cover the “costs” of credentialing.
Recruiting and training. - I would argue this falls under admin in small groups the president or medical director does this.. in larger groups you may have a doc who is doing HR or something similar.
Supplies - we dont have this cost.

In a lean group your med mal + admin + RCM should be 15% or less not 30%.

Now let’s assume a few things. Patient collections are 200/pt. Paid out in salary would be about 170. Thats a group with either strong contracts or a good payer mix. You can have one or the other to get to $200.. if you have both you are probably closer to 250+.

So again, 170/pt.

Docs see 2.2pph thats 374..

Let’s assume that an MLP sees 1.5pph.. Their income plus benefits is 110/hr. That is 255 / hour in revenue and 145/hr in extra to pay the docs.

Let’s assume there are 2 docs working at the same time so that adds $70/hr to each doc. voila you are at 444/hr.

This is a post AI example. I will assure you that my numbers are pretty real on the expense side.
 
One other thing.. its not for everyone.. but if you were getting to take home 170/pt its not hard to imagine you would get greedy and want to push the 2.2 pph to 2.5pph.. that 0.3pph adds another $50/hr.. Thats outside the “happy” zone for some people but others want to hustle and grind while the gettin is good.
 
AI certainly gave you numbers but there's a lot of errors in there. Billing is about the only one you can reliably use as a percentage of revenue. I've got to say, the more I see from AI the less impressed I am with it.
Would have done better just using the SDN search engine than “ai”
 
I'm not sure what you mean by "business operations" but Emergency Medicine is a pretty simple business. See patients and then collect. 30% for that would be a massively inefficient practice. The numbers you are seeing would be total compensation so would include everything (health insurance, HSA, profit sharing, etc.). Granted, $400/hr+ is in the unicorn category and you aren't going to be sitting around doing nothing and will also have midlevels.

Agreed...probably more around 12-15% give or take a little.
 
Where in he country is this gig?
Damn SDG bros... 4-500/hr? Seriously? Sigh.

I'm just destined to always be a CMG pleb.

pauper begging child GIF


Entered EM in rags and apparently will leave EM in rags.
Retired from an SDG making 400+/hr with avg pph 2.1 (group avg 1.9). Admin cost of group 12%. Director pay was avg hourly clinical rate for group - when I was a site director I had up to 40hrs / month admin (25k visit ED, one of our sites).
 
I'm on partner track making over $250/hr. This is a joke.
I saw on EM Docs someone posting a "unicorn" job and the pay for partners was under $300/hr.. i think was like 230-250.. sadly, people dont even know what a great job is anymore..
 
Maybe they see 0.2 pph in the middle of nowhere but I doubt it.
Yeah, if your average is around 1.5pph for that pay, that's not bad. For how busy we are, no way. Our ED sees >100k per year. We have regular 300-350 days, and we cracked 400 a few months ago for the first time. I feel like we earn our pay, but I still feel like we are underpaid for what we do compared to other specialties.
 
I saw on EM Docs someone posting a "unicorn" job and the pay for partners was under $300/hr.. i think was like 230-250.. sadly, people dont even know what a great job is anymore..

How is this possible unless the volumes are really low or they over staff?
 
Yeah, if your average is around 1.5pph for that pay, that's not bad. For how busy we are, no way. Our ED sees >100k per year. We have regular 300-350 days, and we cracked 400 a few months ago for the first time. I feel like we earn our pay, but I still feel like we are underpaid for what we do compared to other specialties.
I agree that we are underpaid. The size of your ED doesnt have to correlate to your PPH. If anything I would argue your biggest risk is being single coverage. There is usually plenty of buffer in busy EDs. One of the hospitals we staffed happened to jump up 25-33% in volume cause a nearby hospital was so messed up. That was solo coverage and that changed the whole thing staffing wise and things got hairy really quickly. If you are in an ED seeing 250 a day and jump to 300.. its busy but lets be real.. the systems around you will collapse likely before the ED physician gets overwhelmed. CT, Labs, ED holds etc.. those will limit your volume. If you work at a place seeing 20-30 a day and your volume jumps to 45-50.. the ancillary services will likely still work fine.
 
How is this possible unless the volumes are really low or they over staff?
Im confused what people are talking about lol.. All im saying is these unicorn jobs pay is terrible. Not sure where the 0.2pph comes from other than previously i mentioned if you go up 0.3pph that could increase pay by $50/hr.
 
Top