- Joined
- May 24, 2006
- Messages
- 3,508
- Reaction score
- 15
I've noticed that there's a lot of people who just want to get published or can't come up with good ideas for publication.
I got a great case-a patient with neurosarcoidosis & everytime it acts up he gets agitated. However since none of the previous doctors who had him rated his agitation on a scale & because I can't do daily MRIs to confirm that its all due to his neurosarcoidosis (which I'm convinced it is), I won't even attempt to publish it.
Reason why I'm convinced its all his neurosarcoidosis is because no psyche med benefitted him, then when he gets a big dose of corticosteroids he's a perfect gentleman again.
When I was chief at my program, some residents came up to me and asked me for ideas for a study for publication. I shot down almost every single one...
"how about a case study where I give this guy who's depressed an antidepressant?"
I was going to pursue a study (& this might be of interest to you Faebinder) where we tracked patients on Risperdal Consta for 2 years. Reason why is because the PACT team put almost all their clients & Risperdal Consta & they were noticing that a subset of their patients, after a specific amount of time on this med seemed to decompensate as if the med stopped working. They even gave me a number of months where it seemed to stop working. That PACT team had dozens of clients so it could be enough for a study. Unfortuantely by the time I got the idea, I only had a few months left in the program.
Wow, interesting study. I am not sure about compliance though... patients are notoriously not compliant with the night dose you need to give with risperdal consta.