- Joined
- Sep 11, 2016
- Messages
- 16
- Reaction score
- 2
There have been an increasing number of posts here where people with doctorates in psychology advise people considering clinical work to pursue Masters Degrees instead of obtaining doctoral level training. I’m not here to debate the relative merits of masters level vs doctoral training and outcomes. I do, however, want to argue another side to the “just get a Masters degree” refrain that is repeated ad naseum from people with doctorates on this board. I have had a Masters degree in counseling for over 6 years now, and am provisionally licensed in two states (ie I am continuing to try and get enough direct client hours to work independently). It sucks, because with my degree I can’t realistically get a job doing therapy, and am instead relegated to jobs with the amorphous job description of “case management”, which in my experience entails many things... little to none of which involves doing therapy. At best, I’m a social worker and at worst I’m a glorified taxi driver being used for my vehicle. I would love to do therapy with my Masters degree, but although I’ve tried in two states to do so, I have been constantly thwarted and lied to about the possibility of getting therapy jobs at my level of licensure. I also know of numerous people who, after they grin and bear the case management grind, can’t get a therapy job post independent licensure because they “don’t have therapy experience”. Each case management job I’ve had coworkers in this type of predicament, and I for one view it as an occupational trap. Therefore, regardless of the relative merits of doctoral vs masters level training, one thing that sticks out is the fact that many doctoral level people don’t know what the actual facts of the masters level job market entail. In my experience, and in the experience of several people I know in two states, Masters level counselors don’t seem to have the automatic ability to do therapy that doctoral level practitioners often assume.