doctorendgame
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2025
- Messages
- 192
- Reaction score
- 133
- Points
- 41
I recently learned Germany tried to suppress Nazism but it ended up helping Nazism rise to power; suppressing free speech almost always backfires on the suppressor, even if it is hate speech. Because they were stripped of free speech, they used that to win propaganda victories that ultimately helped them secure power. Conversely, the third incarnation of the KKK have been around for 80 years and they haven't done anything drastic partially because they are allowed to exercise free speech.
That's why I went from thinking hate speech needs to be stamped out to thinking everyone should have the right to free speech, even if it's hate speech. Needless to say, I've gotten a lot of criticism and even been accused of supporting phobic movements.
Is this too drastic of a topic for being the "other"? Or as long as I make it clear I support it to minimize the long-term harm suppressing it can cause, I'm good to go?
That's why I went from thinking hate speech needs to be stamped out to thinking everyone should have the right to free speech, even if it's hate speech. Needless to say, I've gotten a lot of criticism and even been accused of supporting phobic movements.
Is this too drastic of a topic for being the "other"? Or as long as I make it clear I support it to minimize the long-term harm suppressing it can cause, I'm good to go?
Last edited: