- Joined
- Dec 15, 2007
- Messages
- 121
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
This question really pisses me off because it's erroneous in the way it's stated and because it undermines our algebraic ability.
TPR Hyperlearning Kinematics Practice Question:
7. The work done in pushing an object of mass m (in kg) from rest to speed v (m/s) is given by W = mv^2/2. Find the SI unit for work.
My Side Note: The portion of these practice questions is to take the formula for work (mv^2/2) and derive the units for work which we all know to be kg*m^2/s^2 = joule.
If you didn't already know that, it's impossible to blindly derive it from mv^2/2. This equation is derived from v^2= vnot^2 + 2 ad. Plugging in F/m for a and turning initial velocity to 0 because of the object starts at rest, you get:
2 *(f/m) *d = v^2
With algebra you eventually get:
F*d = 1/2 m v^2 = W
That's what I know off hand.
But if you tried to blindly derive the units for 1/2mv^2 you would just get
(kg*m^2/s^2)/2 = W. How the hell would you get rid of the 1/2 without ruining the true nature of the units. I hate dumb questions. Sorry just hand to rant about it cause I spent like half an hour trying to think about a way to derive it.
TPR Hyperlearning Kinematics Practice Question:
7. The work done in pushing an object of mass m (in kg) from rest to speed v (m/s) is given by W = mv^2/2. Find the SI unit for work.
My Side Note: The portion of these practice questions is to take the formula for work (mv^2/2) and derive the units for work which we all know to be kg*m^2/s^2 = joule.
If you didn't already know that, it's impossible to blindly derive it from mv^2/2. This equation is derived from v^2= vnot^2 + 2 ad. Plugging in F/m for a and turning initial velocity to 0 because of the object starts at rest, you get:
2 *(f/m) *d = v^2
With algebra you eventually get:
F*d = 1/2 m v^2 = W
That's what I know off hand.
But if you tried to blindly derive the units for 1/2mv^2 you would just get
(kg*m^2/s^2)/2 = W. How the hell would you get rid of the 1/2 without ruining the true nature of the units. I hate dumb questions. Sorry just hand to rant about it cause I spent like half an hour trying to think about a way to derive it.