- Joined
- Mar 5, 2009
- Messages
- 436
- Reaction score
- 0
So I was talking to my physical therapist today, and I hope I can get more opinions from you guys here.
So I asked him about going the traditional route (4 yrs undergrad + 3 yrs PT school) vs going into 5 year or 6 year programs and he recommended me going the traditional route, since it isn't info all jammed packed in, and it allows the student to have time to grow in the 4 years of college. Also he said that the 6 year programs are usually lower ranked schools. Attending a higher ranked school does matter, since students will learn more at the higher ranked school (for example, rank 3 vs rank 37, not like rank 3 vs rank 5). Any opinions?
Also this is just a question of mine, I do not want to major in bio since I'm not interested in plants, ecology, etc. Basically I am interested in exercise science and kinesiology. Since I live in CA, I think financially it makes the most sense to attend a UC, but they do not offer exercise science or kinesiology as a major; closest thing is UC Davis with exericse biology, but seems like it's just biology with more of a focus on exercise stuff. I also want to go to a big school (parents want me to stay in CA), so USC came into mind, with it's kinesiology major. But is it worth it to go more into debt for a major that I want, rather than going to a cheaper school and kind of suffering through some courses in my major? Also where would it be easier to get high grades, a UC like Davis or San Diego, or a private like USC?
And kind of random, but how much of a time commitment is an AT major and how much help would it be to one who hopes to pursue the orthopedics side of PT, hopefully with a focus (or at least several cases) or sports medicine?
So I asked him about going the traditional route (4 yrs undergrad + 3 yrs PT school) vs going into 5 year or 6 year programs and he recommended me going the traditional route, since it isn't info all jammed packed in, and it allows the student to have time to grow in the 4 years of college. Also he said that the 6 year programs are usually lower ranked schools. Attending a higher ranked school does matter, since students will learn more at the higher ranked school (for example, rank 3 vs rank 37, not like rank 3 vs rank 5). Any opinions?
Also this is just a question of mine, I do not want to major in bio since I'm not interested in plants, ecology, etc. Basically I am interested in exercise science and kinesiology. Since I live in CA, I think financially it makes the most sense to attend a UC, but they do not offer exercise science or kinesiology as a major; closest thing is UC Davis with exericse biology, but seems like it's just biology with more of a focus on exercise stuff. I also want to go to a big school (parents want me to stay in CA), so USC came into mind, with it's kinesiology major. But is it worth it to go more into debt for a major that I want, rather than going to a cheaper school and kind of suffering through some courses in my major? Also where would it be easier to get high grades, a UC like Davis or San Diego, or a private like USC?
And kind of random, but how much of a time commitment is an AT major and how much help would it be to one who hopes to pursue the orthopedics side of PT, hopefully with a focus (or at least several cases) or sports medicine?