Transforaminal ESI level question

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Personally I would do an LESI unless TFESI is indicted by prior surgery.

But to answer your question i would do L4-5 if only 1 level (assuming its the traversing L5 nerve root you are discussing). If failed, consider L5-S1. I also think a 2 level would be appropriate.
 
Either one is fine, don’t do both levels as a first injection. I would do L4-5 ILESI or TFESI, if that doesn’t work do the two level TFESI.
 
If it looks like the L5 nerve root is being irritated I'd start with an L5-S1 TFESI and consider adding the L4-5 level as well if needed for subsequent procedure.
 
i would do L4 - usually easier, it is where the cause of pathology is (the disc herniation at L4), you will be coating the L5 nerve root at that level and it does spread, patients and surgeons can understand better that the injection was for radicular pain from that specific disc herniation.
 
i would do L4 - usually easier, it is where the cause of pathology is (the disc herniation at L4), you will be coating the L5 nerve root at that level and it does spread, patients and surgeons can understand better that the injection was for radicular pain from that specific disc herniation.
?

maybe infraneural at L4, but L5 is the nerve getting dinged. thats what you need to go after. you would do an L4 TFESI for a lateral or foraminal herniation at L4-5, not a paracentral
 
I’m a bit surprised that there is any confusion here. If it’s an L5 radic from L4-5 disc compressing traversing L5 (not exiting L4)…. Then why would anything but an L5 injection be done (if doing tfesi). Whether subpedic/supra-neural in L5-s1 foramen or Infra-neural/retro-discal in 4-5 foramen… that’s dealers choice. I prefer the former, but prob doesn’t really matter.
 
I’m a bit surprised that there is any confusion here. If it’s an L5 radic from L4-5 disc compressing traversing L5 (not exiting L4)…. Then why would anything but an L5 injection be done (if doing tfesi). Whether subpedic/supra-neural in L5-s1 foramen or Infra-neural/retro-discal in 4-5 foramen… that’s dealers choice. I prefer the former, but prob doesn’t really matter.

Bc 83 and 84 pay more than 83 alone.

Woops, did I say that out loud
 
Question - for a Right sided L4-5 posterolateral disc herniation with L5 nerve impingement would you guys inject at L4-5 (L5 traverses) or L5-S1 (L5 exits)?
I usually try to address the nerve root impinged by the herniation. In this case I would start off with L5-S1 TFESI. If this doesn’t last at least three months, then I would repeat it and add the L4-L5 level.
 
disc level and impinged nerve level. L4-5-1. If classic radicular pain to dorsum

Usually treat symptoms not mri so if to sole of foot L5-1-2 with same mri.

Plus heir and a spare. blobogram as reasons
 
I’m a bit surprised that there is any confusion here. If it’s an L5 radic from L4-5 disc compressing traversing L5 (not exiting L4)…. Then why would anything but an L5 injection be done (if doing tfesi). Whether subpedic/supra-neural in L5-s1 foramen or Infra-neural/retro-discal in 4-5 foramen… that’s dealers choice. I prefer the former, but prob doesn’t really matter.
 
The issue is, if doing a single level the patient doesn’t meet the response criteria dictated by whatever insurance you deal with they will likely deny a second injection, even if you try a separate level. More likely to get a response by hitting two levels.
 
Can you cite any study/literature to support this?
Preganglionic TFESI better than ganglionic for short-term follow-up (1 month) while ganglionic was better than preganglionic for midterm follow-up (6 months).

Preganglionic ESI has a 2.38 (95% CI 1.12, 5.04) times statistically significantly higher chance of effectiveness when compared to ganglionic ESI.


It would seem that preganglionic ESI, in this case L4-5 TFESI, would be the better option if you only have the option of doing a single level TFESI.

I would still do both levels on the same visit for aforementioned reasons.
 
Preganglionic TFESI better than ganglionic for short-term follow-up (1 month) while ganglionic was better than preganglionic for midterm follow-up (6 months).

Preganglionic ESI has a 2.38 (95% CI 1.12, 5.04) times statistically significantly higher chance of effectiveness when compared to ganglionic ESI.


It would seem that preganglionic ESI, in this case L4-5 TFESI, would be the better option if you only have the option of doing a single level TFESI.

I would still do both levels on the same visit for aforementioned reasons.
Do L4-5 then two level if necessary.
 
If I do an ESI without new MRI and the patient doesn’t do as well as we hoped, I think I always find out I was doing the pre-ganglionic injection after new imaging.
 
Top