- Joined
- Feb 20, 2005
- Messages
- 59
- Reaction score
- 0
I have posted a few times in the past and I recieved some excellent advice, so here I am again.
I am currently a therapist training in dosimetry. However, I will be an MS1 this coming fall. Having read this forum diligently over the last year, I know the value of research in Rad Onc. Thus, I have just submitted an abstract for consideration at ASTRO. So my question is this, does it matter when obtaining residencies whether your pubs were abstracts or full length papers? I would assume that full length papers hold more weight but I recall reading something about ERAS not making a distinction between the two.
Second, lets assume my paper is rejected by ASTRO but accepted by RSNA (yes, I checked that box). What, if any, difference does that make?
I am currently a therapist training in dosimetry. However, I will be an MS1 this coming fall. Having read this forum diligently over the last year, I know the value of research in Rad Onc. Thus, I have just submitted an abstract for consideration at ASTRO. So my question is this, does it matter when obtaining residencies whether your pubs were abstracts or full length papers? I would assume that full length papers hold more weight but I recall reading something about ERAS not making a distinction between the two.
Second, lets assume my paper is rejected by ASTRO but accepted by RSNA (yes, I checked that box). What, if any, difference does that make?