UChicago(Pritzker) vs UVA

[fluk77]

Advertisement - Members don't see this ad

UChicago(Pritzker)

Pros
Possible better financial aid
Higher ranked with prestige?
Stronger match list to T20 residency programs nationally
Diverse clinical training
Focus on urban underserved work
Easy to get research opportunities

Cons
Cost of living high
Big city, never lived in a big city before
Brutal Chicago winter - come from the southern state
Safety concerns around Hyde Park area
Focus on academic medicine, which I am not particularly interested in
AOA

UVA
Pros
P/F for pre-clinical and clinical
In a great college town. Love it. Should be very safe.
Weather much nicer in winter.
COL still high, but should be lower than that of Chicago
Still solid match list

Cons
Ranked lower. I think that T20 is a line. UChicago above it and UVA below it.
Match list is relatively regional
Research funding is about half of that UChicago, so research may be harder to find.
AOA

Location and weather wise, I prefer UVA. Weather and safety is a concern for me for UChicago. Am I over worried about something nonessential? It is hard to turn down a T20 for a T30. In my opinion, they belong to different tier of med schools, so may have an impact to my future career.

What are your opinions?

 

[riv_jordan]

Am I over worried about something nonessential?

Yes, you are and that thing is rankings/prestige. This is especially odd considering that you aren't interested in academic medicine. You clearly seem more excited about UVA and thankfully, UVA is one of the best medical schools in the country. Any regionality you notice in the match list can surely be attributed to student preferences (but honestly, looking at their match list for 2025 it actually seems to be a very broad spread).

Even if prestige is something that is really important to you, I think you are conflating layman prestige with medical prestige. This might be why you see UVA as in a "different tier of med school" than Pritzker. In reality, the two institutions are held in similar regard within medicine. Funnily enough, according to the rankings on admit.org (not endorsing these rankings just using them as an example), UChicago is ranked #21 and UVA is #28, so neither technically crosses that mythical T20 line.

I say, wait for financial aid to come in and if there's a significant cost difference, follow the money. But assuming similar cost, I recommend going where you truly believe you will thrive and not letting prestige determine your decision.

 

[fluk77]

@riv_jordan Thank you very much for your feedback.
When I am talking about ranking, I generally refer to the earlier USNews medical school ranking prior to 2024. I found the historical USNews rankings at . General speaking, UChicago was ranked between #10 to #20 (#8 to #22) for the last 20+ years, while UVA ranked between #20 to #30 (#22 - #31) at the same time. That is why I have the impression that there is a difference in their ranking tier, since I believe that T20 is a hard line between solid and elite medical schools.
Now my question is if there is difference in their prestige, could the prestige of UChicago be overridden by bad weather and safety concerns in Hyde Park?
Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.

 

[riv_jordan]

@riv_jordan Thank you very much for your feedback.
When I am talking about ranking, I generally refer to the earlier USNews medical school ranking prior to 2024. I found the historical USNews rankings at . General speaking, UChicago was ranked between #10 to #20 (#8 to #22) for the last 20+ years, while UVA ranked between #20 to #30 (#22 - #31) at the same time. That is why I have the impression that there is a difference in their ranking tier, since I believe that T20 is a hard line between solid and elite medical schools.
Now my question is if there is difference in their prestige, could the prestige of UChicago be overridden by bad weather and safety concerns in Hyde Park?
Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.

The fact that you have this spreadsheet only further affirms my belief that you are placing too much emphasis on prestige. But everyone is entitled to their own priorities and I won't try to convince you to change yours.

But to answer your question, I think that if you're concerned about weather and safety in Chicago, those are certainly valid reasons to choose UVA instead. I'm actually fairly familiar with Hyde Park and in my opinion, the safety issues are overblown and the weather has never been a problem for me. But people who grew up in warm places often have tough adjustments to the cold (especially Chicago cold), and if you've never lived in a big city before, Chicago may be a little scary. Feeling comfortable and safe is a bare minimum requirement for success in med school, so I think those are more than valid reasons to choose one school over another.

If you can visit both schools and/or talk to students, I'd really recommend that. The choice may feel very clear after that. Also, if you're waiting for financial aid, see if there's a significant cost difference. That may end up making the decision for you.

 

[polymerization]

Personally, I am somewhat moved by prestige. I don't necessarily believe it is as avaricious as some might imply. If you are approaching your medical training without pedigree, it is a reasonable and strategic consideration to reach for it in a competitive process that obviously values that kind of thing. If it was pointless and nobody cares, people would not be applying to Ivy+ programs, and yet, they are somehow both most popular amongst the strongest students and most selective within that pool.

Prestige is also a proxy that predicts network effects and more/better general resources available to students. Both will get you to an MD but there's a difference between a Lamborghini and a Cadillac. Both nice... they're just different and attract unique types of drivers.

Because of that, I bristle when I see an argument that essentially implies prestige is immaterial and one is best suited to attend whatever school has the lowest rank. There will be stereotypes applied to you regardless of where you go, that's life... choose the school you're most excited about because, at the end of the day, it can cost what it costs, it can have all kinds of problems and frustrations... but when you go home at night, you are the only person that needs to be satisfied with the decision you made.

 

[riv_jordan]

Personally, I am somewhat moved by prestige. I don't necessarily believe it is as avaricious as some might imply. If you are approaching your medical training without pedigree, it is a reasonable and strategic consideration to reach for it in a competitive process that obviously values that kind of thing. If it was pointless and nobody cares, people would not be applying to Ivy+ programs, and yet, they are somehow both most popular amongst the strongest students and most selective within that pool.

Prestige is also a proxy that predicts network effects and more/better general resources available to students. Both will get you to an MD but there's a difference between a Lamborghini and a Cadillac. Both nice... they're just different and attract unique types of drivers.

Because of that, I bristle when I see an argument that essentially implies prestige is immaterial and one is best suited to attend whatever school has the lowest rank. There will be stereotypes applied to you regardless of where you go, that's life... choose the school you're most excited about because, at the end of the day, it can cost what it costs, it can have all kinds of problems and frustrations... but when you go home at night, you are the only person that needs to be satisfied with the decision you made.

I don't want to distract too much away from the topic of discussion but I also don't want to be misunderstood. I agree, prestige definitely matters. But it's not like we're choosing between Harvard and a newly opened school. I just think that OP shouldn't allow a 10-rank difference along a volatile (and now essentially defunct) ranking website cause them to choose one school over another that they would otherwise prefer. There's nothing in OP's post that suggest they have career goals so specific that the prestige difference between UVA and Pritzker has any practical significance.
I may have come off as more judgmental than I meant to be. Ultimately, OP will make whatever decision they want and they certainly wouldn't be the first to place high value on rankings.

 

[Med Ed]

General speaking, UChicago was ranked between #10 to #20 (#8 to #22) for the last 20+ years, while UVA ranked between #20 to #30 (#22 - #31) at the same time. That is why I have the impression that there is a difference in their ranking tier, since I believe that T20 is a hard line between solid and elite medical schools.
Now my question is if there is difference in their prestige, could the prestige of UChicago be overridden by bad weather and safety concerns in Hyde Park?
Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.

The original ranking was reverse engineered to make Harvard #1 (the public would not view the new ranking system as valid otherwise). The methodology is otherwise arbitrary, and can be altered to create any output that is desired. Your "hard line" is just your brain desperately seeking a heuristic approach to a messy world. I worry that people who have this level of concern for research rankings (which are just shorthand for total research funding) will later exhibit signs of maladaptive perfectionism.

Put another way, if you are seriously worried about getting cold and mugged in Chi-town, then go enjoy the Izods of Mr. Jefferson's university, and don't ever give it another thought.

 

[polymerization]

I don't want to distract too much away from the topic of discussion but I also don't want to be misunderstood. I agree, prestige definitely matters. But it's not like we're choosing between Harvard and a newly opened school. I just think that OP shouldn't allow a 10-rank difference along a volatile (and now essentially defunct) ranking website cause them to choose one school over another that they would otherwise prefer. There's nothing in OP's post that suggest they have career goals so specific that the prestige difference between UVA and Pritzker has any practical significance.
I may have come off as more judgmental than I meant to be. Ultimately, OP will make whatever decision they want and they certainly wouldn't be the first to place high value on rankings.

Not at all, I think your point was well-made and I agree with a great deal of it. Where I diverge is in the belief that prestige can be something other than just hubris manifest. Prestige obfuscates and de-quantifies wealth. My opinion on @Med Ed asserting people would not believe a system of rankings that did not have Harvard at #1 is explainable simply because it is well-known Harvard is the wealthiest, and people cannot imagine disentangling wealth from a slew of other unrelated virtues that, in many cases, are not even true. It's a weird hybrid of a halo effect and prosperity gospel, applied to institutions.

While the perception/reputation of a school and their actual academic quality may not line up precisely, I also suspect there are meaningful differences between public and private institutions, especially of this caliber. I still made it to an Ivy League medical school from my garbage public high school, where teachers would turn-over in multiple classes mid-year, and classes would regularly get cancelled.

I'm pretty sure if I would've gone to a Hotchkiss, or a Phillips-Exeter, or a Choate Rosemary... yeah, maybe my high school and college experience would've looked and felt different. Maybe I would've ended up at the same place at the end of the day...but I can say confidently that it probably would not have been as challenging and tumultuous. Maybe I would have had to do less of this on my own; I could've gotten more help. Enthusiastic, consultative, personalized help—not "I have 75 appointments for advising with students today, I don't have time for this" help, like I got in college.

As much as social inequality and exclusivity in education disgusts me and frustrates my worldview, I know I will probably be one of those parents that stresses over getting their kid into the right preschool someday.

Some will scoff, it's well-deserved.

Personally, I think the difference between Pritzker and UVA in terms of their composition, mission, and trajectories are significant enough to be wary of an argument saying they're both the same. We didn't apply to these schools under the impression that they were all the same—in fact, we are tasked with finding even minute differences to talk about in our secondaries. So, we know schools view themselves as brands that have specific value-adds. If OP is optimizing for opportunity, I think they will have more, objectively, at Pritzker. Of course, it is contingent on more than simply waltzing into a building.

(TL;DR: The only rankings that matter are a simple descending list of universities by endowment, at least, in the ways that seem to be most consequential for students. In that sense, the decision becomes a lot more clear.)

 

[Med Ed]

Personally, I think the difference between Pritzker and UVA in terms of their composition, mission, and trajectories are significant enough to be wary of an argument saying they're both the same.

I don’t think any reasonable argument could be made to this effect. The schools being debated are obviously not interchangeable.

The point here is that the OP should feel comfortable using their own priorities and criteria to make a choice.