UChicago vs. Rochester

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Prana

New Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
May 10, 2004
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Hey all,

I am deciding between the University of Chicago and Rochester. Anyone have any great advice as I am truly torn over these schools. I feel that both schools are solid. I like the curriculum at Rochester better, but would be more excited about living in Chicago! Any words of wisdom would be much appreciated. Thanks!
 
If it helps at all, I initially wanted to be closer to home and in a big city (specifically, Boston). However, after visiting Rochester, things completely changed. I loved my experiences up there and knew that was the place I wanted to be. It was a gut feeling more than anything, but I think a lot of it had to do with the students I met. I had a plane flight out of Rochester the day after my interview and I had some time to kill before my flight, so I went back to the medical school and just hung around for awhile. During that time, many current first-years came up to me voluntarily and told me how much they loved going to school there. They talked about how much they enjoyed their fellow classmates and how the atmosphere to learn was wonderful. Students enjoyed helping each other, the faculty and administration were prominently involved in a good way and genuinely cared about the success and happiness of their students. Plus, you can't beat the curriculum.

If you're a city person at heart, then it seems that you probably wouldn't be that happy in Rochester. At the same time, I've just spent a couple weeks in Rochester with my family and fiancee looking for a place to live (we found an awesome house!!) and I was surprised at how nice various parts of the city and surrounding areas are. It's no Chicago obviously, but after living in a couple cities of comparable size, I can definitely say it has more culture than they do.

I suppose the chances for being bored in Rochester on any given free night are greater, but how many free nights are you truly going to have in medical school anyway? To me, how happy I felt at the school itself and not its city became the crucial factor.

Hope at least some of what I said makes sense.
 
I'm with JH on this one. I absolutely loved Rochester! I spent all of last summer working at the school and believe me, there are things to do. Granted, Chicago will have more choices on what to do or where to go, but it's all in Rochester, just on a smaller scale.

Personally I think Chicago uses an outdated curriculum while Rochester is actively trying to improve theirs year after year.

When you think about it, you're going to spend 4 years in med school and not have a whole lot of free time outside of that. If I'm not going to have that much free time, I wouldn't really care where I lived. I'd rather go to a school where I liked the curriculum and people I was working with.

Let me know what you decide and maybe I'll see you in the fall.

Zeke
 
ZekeMD said:
Personally I think Chicago uses an outdated curriculum while Rochester is actively trying to improve theirs year after year.

Zeke

how is it outdated? just curious, since I am down to the wire too and Chicago is on the list. Of course my choices all have traditional curriculums....
 
OldLady said:
how is it outdated? just curious, since I am down to the wire too and Chicago is on the list. Of course my choices all have traditional curriculums....
Outdated probably wasn't the best word to use for the situation. When I was looking at Chicago, and from talking to various people, it seems like their curriculum is very traditional while many medical schools are changing their curricula dramatically. It is just my opinion that it is better to be at a school with an innovative curriculum that changes according to feedback. I don't think Chicago has a system in place to get feedback from students and modify their curriculum.
 
ZekeMD said:
Outdated probably wasn't the best word to use for the situation. When I was looking at Chicago, and from talking to various people, it seems like their curriculum is very traditional while many medical schools are changing their curricula dramatically. It is just my opinion that it is better to be at a school with an innovative curriculum that changes according to feedback. I don't think Chicago has a system in place to get feedback from students and modify their curriculum.
My feeling is that Pritzker has much confidence in its curriculum, and it knows that it's attracting a certain type of people. And the so-called curriculum usually refers to the 1st two years of basic science. Compared to clinical training, basic science doesn't seem to matter as much.
 
CalBeE said:
And the so-called curriculum usually refers to the 1st two years of basic science. Compared to clinical training, basic science doesn't seem to matter as much.

But that's just it...Rochester is trying to make all four years into a unified and coherent curriculum; they're trying to show how basic science DOES matter instead of leaving it up to the student to figure it out (or not). The Double Helix curriculum, the PBLs, and their other initiatives are aimed at blending basic science with clinical medicine. Rochester is trying to use the biopsychosocial model (which, essentially, began in Rochester) to create a better form of medical education--one that recognizes that basic science is not distinct from clinical medicine.


josehernandez94 said:
Students enjoyed helping each other, the faculty and administration were prominently involved in a good way and genuinely cared about the success and happiness of their students.

Absolutely. Members of the curriculum committee are very much in touch with medical students and, just as importantely, recent graduates, and are very aware of what is and is not working...in fact the committee members that I talked to were quick to point out where the curriculum was lacking and then describe what they are considering doing to change that.

So, to the OP, Rochester and Chicago are both great schools but have very different curriculums; each appeals to a different crowd. If you'd prefer a lecture-type environment, go with Pritzker; if you think you'd be happier with an integrated curriculum, go with Rochester.
 
Javert,

Are you currently attending Rochester, or will you be?
 
I'm an undergrad at Rochester...one year left. I'm actually in the BS/MD program here, but have decided to go the MD/PhD route, so I'm going through the upcoming application process.

As you can probably tell, Rochester is at the top of my list for MD/PhD programs. 😍
 
I'm an undergrad at Rochester...one year left. I'm actually in the BS/MD program here, but have decided to go the MD/PhD route, so I'm going through the upcoming application process.

Well good luck to you Javert. If you need any help or have any questions about the application process get ahold of me. I'll be moving to Rochester in a couple weeks.

-Zeke
 
ZekeMD said:
Well good luck to you Javert. If you need any help or have any questions about the application process get ahold of me. I'll be moving to Rochester in a couple weeks.

-Zeke

I was going to just write "ditto" but the annoying rules of this stupid forum have made me waste my time and yours by writing superfluous characters.

so in any event, ditto to everything zeke said
 
Thanks...and if you have any ?s about the city or anything else, let me know; I'll be around all summer doing research.
 
Top Bottom